Complex & Real Frequency in Control System

  • Thread starter Thread starter techvineet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Frequency
AI Thread Summary
Complex frequency in control systems is represented as s = σ + jω, where σ is the decay rate and ω is the oscillation frequency. The real part, σ, indicates how quickly the amplitude of oscillations decreases, while the imaginary part, ω, reflects how often the signal oscillates. In the context of control systems, the stability of a system is primarily determined by the real part of the poles in the complex frequency plane. The Laplace transform is used to analyze circuits by converting components like capacitors and inductors into their s-domain equivalents, allowing for algebraic manipulation. Understanding complex frequency is essential for analyzing the frequency response of systems, particularly in designing filters.
techvineet
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Complex... Frequency

Hi,
Can anybody explain me what is complex frequency and what is real frequency. In control system my teacher taught me about frequency-domain. This is exactly where he used these words.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
s=jw

w = rad/sec
j = sqrt(-1)

I assume you're talking about electric circuits here so here's how i'll explain it.
All resistors, caps, and inductors are dealt with as impedances. That is, once you transform the circuit into this s-domain it's all the impedances are treated like resistors. When you start out you will write out the differential equation of the regular node and then you will laplace transform the equation.
 
I will elaborate Goalie's post:

the general complex frequency, s, can be thought of in terms of its real and imaginary parts:

s = σ + jω

or in terms of its period and periodic decay rate:

s = T-1e.

The former is always the most appropriate way to use the complex frequency in a Laplace or Fourier transform, however the latter offers a bit more insight.


The imaginary part of s:

Im{s} = ω

is what you would normally think of as "frequency." It tells you how often the signal goes from positive to negative. The real part of s:

Re{s} = σ

is what you would normally think of as "decay rate." It tells you how quickly the amplitude of the oscillations change.

What does this have to do with control systems? In control systems, one of the key concerns is stability. The σ (of the poles of the system response) is usually the most important consideration in that respect.
 
If you have a system that can be calculated, the poles and zeros may be found in the complex frequency plane. However, as pointed out by O. Heavyside, this is largely a useless exersize, the spectral responce is of much more use even though the poles and zeros do completely describe the system.

Best
 
To analyse an analog filter circuit for intance you would replace C by 1/sC and and L by sL to construct the Laplace transform of the circuit. Then you can use normal algebra to simplify the equations.

For example a lowpass filter with only a resistor and a capacitor:
H(s) = \frac{ \frac{1}{sC} }{\frac{1}{sC}+R} = \frac{1}{1+sRC}

Next you replace s by jw = j 2 \pi f in which f is the frequency you are interested in. The result is a complex frequency in which the relation between the input amplitude and the output magnitude is the gain for that frequency.

Below a screenshot and script that calculates the frequency response and runs on http://www.adacs.com/menu/PDAcalc_matrix.php for the palm, PocketPC and windows.

001 R=1000;
002 C=10E-07;
003 Fc=1/(2*pi*R*C)
004
005 f=logspace(0.1,3);
006 w=1j*2*pi*f;
007 H=1./(1+w.*R*C);
008 semilogx(f,abs(H))
009 title('Frequency response')
010 xlabel('Frequency')
011 ylabel('Gain')
012 pause
013 clf
014 semilogx(f,angle(H))
015 title('Phase response')
016 xlabel('Frequency')
017 ylabel('Angle')

http://www.adacs.com/menu/img/RCnetwork.gif

Hope it helps to give you a better idea. If not at least it did help me since I never used LaTex before :-)

________________________________________________
Evert Rozendaal
Programmable calculators for palm, PocketPC and windows
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Back
Top