Solving Fractions: How to Solve x/36-x = 12/36-12 + 3.013/0.20(36-3.013)

  • Thread starter Thread starter martine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction
AI Thread Summary
The equation x/36-x = 12/36-12 + 3.013/0.20(36-3.013) is ambiguous due to the lack of parentheses, leading to confusion about the intended fractions. Clarification is needed on whether the left side is meant as (x/36) - x or x/(36 - x), and similarly for the right side expressions. The correct approach involves isolating x by eliminating fractions through multiplication, followed by combining like terms. Despite attempts to solve, the provided solution of 17.6 does not match the calculations based on the interpretations discussed. Proper notation is essential for accurately solving such equations.
martine
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
No homework, just a problem I'm faced with at work. And being the granny I am, this is ages ago since I solved anything like this.


x/36-x = 12/36-12 + 3.013/0.20(36-3.013)

The solution to this is 17.6. The question is: how do I solve such equations for x? If I ignore the 36 on the left side and asume it's not a fraction it's no problem, but um.. this is too long ago.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is the left hand side \frac{x}{36-x} or \frac{x}{36} - x ? I'm not sure where the fraction ends.
In the first case multiplying both sides by 36-x will get you rid of the fraction, in the second case multiply with 36. Then you can use addition and subtraction to solve for x.

But no matter how i put the parenthesis in your equation i do not get the solution 17.6.
 
first add all like term like the one whit out the x, then isolate for x, then you will have the answer.
 
martine said:
No homework, just a problem I'm faced with at work. And being the granny I am, this is ages ago since I solved anything like this.


x/36-x = 12/36-12 + 3.013/0.20(36-3.013)

The solution to this is 17.6. The question is: how do I solve such equations for x? If I ignore the 36 on the left side and asume it's not a fraction it's no problem, but um.. this is too long ago.
What you have written is straightforward and unambiguous, but it might not mean what you intend. Writing fractional expressions as text on one line requires the use of parentheses for numerators or denominators that have multiple terms.

For x/36 - x, did you mean (x/36) - x or x/(36 - x)?
For 12/36 - 12 did you mean (12/36) - 12 or 12/(36 - 12)? The first is a negative number; the value of the second is 1/2.

For 3.013/0.20(36-3.013), did you mean (3.013/0.20) * (36 - 3.013) or 3.013/(0.20 *(36 - 3.013))?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top