Physicists build world's smallest motor Berkeley News

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the development of the smallest synthetic motor, as highlighted by Alex Zettl, a professor at UC Berkeley. He notes that while synthetic motors are advancing, biological motors still hold a slight edge in size. The conversation then shifts to the concept of large engines, with participants expressing skepticism about the performance of a specific large engine mentioned. There are calculations presented regarding horsepower per ton, with a comparison made between a large engine's output and a hypothetical scenario involving multiple GSX-R 750 turbo motorcycles, emphasizing the potential for higher horsepower and a more appealing sound. Overall, the dialogue reflects a blend of fascination with advancements in synthetic motors and a playful critique of large engine performance.
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,194
Reaction score
2,535
"It's the smallest synthetic motor that's ever been made," said Alex Zettl, professor of physics at UC Berkeley and faculty scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. "Nature is still a little bit ahead of us - there are biological motors that are equal or slightly smaller in size - but we are catching up."

Animated image available for download

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/07/23_motor.shtml
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what will they think of next?!? the world's largest engine?
http://www.jerry-howell.com/12-Cylinder.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
wow that engine is really bad. (the big one)

100,000 bhp may seem a lot, but that's only 50 bhp per ton!

2000 tonns of GSX-R 750 turbo's would make 500,000 bhp. (at 200 bhp per ton) plus would sound cooler.

i think my calculations are correct. feel free to say other wise.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

RIP Mary Gaillard (1939-2025)
Replies
3
Views
205
Physics What are the steps to becoming a physicist?
Replies
1
Views
3K
Sandia Res. Reveals Impact of "Metallic Water" on Neptune & Physics
Replies
2
Views
4K
News Is Colin Powell a Compulsive Liar ?
Replies
23
Views
7K
News Patriot Act 2: Summarized by Alex Jones
Replies
10
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top