Register to reply

Matrices/Linear Algebra Proof

by ahsanxr
Tags: algebra, matrices or linear, proof
Share this thread:
ahsanxr
#1
Sep8-10, 10:29 PM
P: 341
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

Let A be an n x n matrix. Show that if A2=0 then I - A is non-singular and (I - A)-1= I + A

2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution

Ok, so I started off with finding the general form of a 2x2 matrix which when squared gives a zero matrix, and all the properties above are satisfied. But how do I show that for an n x n matrix? Please help me out.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Fungus deadly to AIDS patients found to grow on trees
Canola genome sequence reveals evolutionary 'love triangle'
Scientists uncover clues to role of magnetism in iron-based superconductors
Dick
#2
Sep8-10, 10:35 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,228
What is (I-A)*(I+A)?
ahsanxr
#3
Sep8-10, 10:36 PM
P: 341
The Identity matrix.

Dick
#4
Sep8-10, 10:39 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,228
Matrices/Linear Algebra Proof

Quote Quote by ahsanxr View Post
The Identity matrix.
Hence? What do you conclude from that?
ahsanxr
#5
Sep8-10, 10:41 PM
P: 341
But I only know that because the question says to show it and the "experiment" I did with my 2x2 matrix shows that. I cannot prove it. Please give a more thorough explanation :)
Dick
#6
Sep8-10, 10:42 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,228
Quote Quote by ahsanxr View Post
But I only know that because the question says to show it and the "experiment" I did with my 2x2 matrix shows that. I cannot prove it. Please give a more thorough explanation :)
If A*B=I then A=B^(-1). Isn't that the definition of inverse?
ahsanxr
#7
Sep8-10, 10:44 PM
P: 341
Yes, obviously. I do not know how that is connected to the question though. It asks us to show that the inverse of I-A is I+A which at this point is not self-evident (or at least I think so).
Dick
#8
Sep8-10, 10:49 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,228
Quote Quote by ahsanxr View Post
Yes, obviously. I do not know how that is connected to the question though. It asks us to show that the inverse of I-A is I+A which at this point is not self-evident (or at least I think so).
Now you are just plain confusing me. If (I-A)*(I+A)=I then as I read the definition of 'inverse' that means (I-A)^(-1)=(I+A). If you mean showing its the inverse by using the explicit calculation you probably used for 2x2 matrices, then you can't do that. You don't know what A is. It's still true though.
ahsanxr
#9
Sep8-10, 10:52 PM
P: 341
Quote Quote by Dick View Post
(I-A)*(I+A)=I
How? This is my question.
Dick
#10
Sep8-10, 10:55 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,228
Quote Quote by ahsanxr View Post
How? This is my question.
Multiply it out. (I+A)*(I-A)=? Use the distributive property! I thought you did that in post 3. I may have been wrong.
ahsanxr
#11
Sep8-10, 11:02 PM
P: 341
Can you do that with matrices? I have read the property that (A+B)C=AC+BC but only to that extent.
Dick
#12
Sep8-10, 11:04 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,228
Quote Quote by ahsanxr View Post
Can you do that with matrices? I have read the property that (A+B)C=AC+BC but only to that extent.
Sure you can. (I+A)(I-A)=I(I-A)+A(I-A). Now distribute again.
Samuelb88
#13
Sep8-10, 11:05 PM
P: 162
Yes, suppose C = D+E, hence AC+BC=(A+B)(D+E).
ahsanxr
#14
Sep8-10, 11:08 PM
P: 341
Of course. That was kind of a stupid question. Thanks for clearing it up.

The question first asks us to show that I-A is non-singular. How do we show that? Or does that follow from (I-A)(I+A)=I and since I has an inverse, it must be non-singular?
Samuelb88
#15
Sep8-10, 11:10 PM
P: 162
When two matrices are multiplied together to produce the identity, it means the two matrices are inverses of each other. What is the definition of a non-singular matrix?
Dick
#16
Sep8-10, 11:11 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,228
Quote Quote by ahsanxr View Post
Of course. That was kind of a stupid question. Thanks for clearing it up.

The question first asks us to show that I-A is non-singular. How do we show that? Or does that follow from (I-A)(I+A)=I and since I has an inverse, it must be non-singular?
You KNOW I has an inverse. It's I! It's doesn't follow from that. Please quote me the definition of what an inverse is?
ahsanxr
#17
Sep8-10, 11:13 PM
P: 341
A matrix multiplied by the original matrix to give Identity.
Dick
#18
Sep8-10, 11:18 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,228
Quote Quote by ahsanxr View Post
A matrix multiplied by the original matrix to give Identity.
Ok, so (I+A)(I-A)=I. What's the inverse of (I-A)?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Linear Algebra (Vector spaces, linear independent subsets, transformations) Calculus & Beyond Homework 12
Linear Algebra: Linear Independence and writing Matrices as linear combinations Calculus & Beyond Homework 7
Linear algebra (impact of solution of theory of linear equations) Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Linear Algebra: Linear Transformation and Linear Independence Calculus & Beyond Homework 8
LINEAR ALGEBRA - Describe the kernel of a linear transformation GEOMETRICALLY Calculus & Beyond Homework 6