How Do Theoretical Concepts Guide the Design of Particle Physics Experiments?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the desire to bridge theoretical particle physics concepts, such as scattering cross-sections and decay rates, with practical experimental applications. The individual seeks resources that clarify measurable quantities and the rationale behind beam and detector design in experiments, particularly in relation to the LHC. They express frustration with the disconnect between theoretical texts and experimental literature. Recommendations include the book "Collider Physics" by Barger and Phillips, which, despite being somewhat dated, may provide valuable insights. The participant also mentions an engineering background and a goal to enhance their understanding of the physical implications of theoretical concepts through experimental context.
maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi,

I've spent an enormous time through coursework and self-reading on learning different things in basic particle physics theory, such as scattering cross-sections, decay rates, etc. I am looking to connect the things I have learned in theory to experiments. This may seem a little vague, but I want to know which quantities are measurable, what the motivation behind designing beams and detectors the way they are, is, based on theory. The theory books dwell too much on theory, whereas experimental treatises tend to be divorced from theory (at least the few I've encountered).

Suggestions are welcome!

I am not sure if this is the right subforum for this query, but since it is more of a pedagogical nature, I thought it would be best to put it here than the hep forum.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you gone to TASI?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Have you gone to TASI?

If you mean the conference, I have not attended it. I am not sure what you meant though?

I am looking for books/review articles which could explain me the connections between (say) things in Halzen and Martin/Peskin and Schroeder and the kind of experiments at the LHC. For instance, if I want to study process X, what are the quantities I can measure, and what are the things I have to infer? And when I know that, how do I design the experiment? What kinds of detection schemes are relevant?
 
Well, it's a summer school, but this is typically where theory grad students are exposed to this sort of thing.

If you're looking for a book, while it's phenomenology is somewhat dated, you might take a look at Collider Physics by Barger and Phillips. If that's not what you are interested in, you might list its shortcomings and we can point you in a better direction.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Well, it's a summer school, but this is typically where theory grad students are exposed to this sort of thing.

Yeah I saw the website. I couldn't get access to the old course materials, and for the kind of stuff I want to learn/pick up, it might be a bit advanced. I have an engineering background, and now that I am reading theory books, I want to connect the theory to the experiment and get a better physical picture. Hence the question.

If you're looking for a book, while it's phenomenology is somewhat dated, you might take a look at Collider Physics by Barger and Phillips. If that's not what you are interested in, you might list its shortcomings and we can point you in a better direction.

Thanks Vanadium. Are you referring to "Linear Collider Physics in the New Millennium. Publisher: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd | ISBN: 9812389083"? I'll check it out. Chances are it won't be outdated for me, because I'm not looking for the "new" and "hot" stuff yet.
 
No, the title is simply "Collider Physics".
 
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...

Similar threads

Back
Top