Linear Polarization: Active or Passive Element?

AI Thread Summary
A linear polarizer is classified as a passive element, as it does not actively rotate the polarization angle of light but instead filters it. The classic experiment involving three polarizers demonstrates this, where the middle polarizer at 45 degrees allows light to pass through two orthogonally aligned polarizers. When light strikes the polarizer, it induces a current in the wires, which filters the light based on its polarization orientation. The polarizer effectively decomposes the incoming light into two components, one that passes through and one that does not. This process does not involve active rotation but rather absorption and reflection based on the alignment with the polarizer's structure.
ProTerran
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi, is a linear polarizer acting like an active element that rotates polarization angle or is it just a passive element?

I wonder about this because there is this experiment with three polarizers, where two of them are rotated 90 degree to each other so no light can pass through, and then third polarizer is put between those two with i.e. 45 degrees so that light can pass.

What physical phenomena is behind this?

Best regards.

(Note: English isn't my mother language)
 
Science news on Phys.org
It is a passive device. It is a classical experiment as well and does not require quantum mechanics to explain how it works.

The polarizer can be made of a fine grid of wires in the vertical direction. When light strikes it, it makes current flow up and down the wires. If the incoming wave is vertically polarized it will be reflected by the wires. If horizontally polarized it will not. At 45 degrees, half the light is reflected and half transmitted *and rotated* to vertical linearly polarized light by the current flow and orientation of the wires.

Edit: you can view this as a decomposition into two waves one of which is passed by the polarizer and one which is not. In this case the polarizer does not rotate the wave but just filters it. Both are mathematically and physically equivalent.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your response.

So does that mean that the current flow induced in "wires" by incident light on the polarizer surface is causing rearranging of the light polarization and absorption/reflection of the light whose polarization angle is lined up with the polarizer "wires"?
 
Yes, exactly.
 
I would like to use a pentaprism with some amount of magnification. The pentaprism will be used to reflect a real image at 90 degrees angle but I also want the reflected image to appear larger. The distance between the prism and the real image is about 70cm. The pentaprism has two reflecting sides (surfaces) with mirrored coating and two refracting sides. I understand that one of the four sides needs to be curved (spherical curvature) to achieve the magnification effect. But which of the...
Back
Top