Fourth Moment in Terms of Correlations

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcusl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moment Terms
AI Thread Summary
Isserlis' theorem provides a way to calculate the fourth moment of multivariate normal distributions using cross-correlations. The equation presented holds specifically for normally distributed random variables, as the fourth-order cumulant (FOC) for general random variables is typically non-zero, while it is zero for normal distributions. The discussion also raises questions about the applicability of these results to non-normal distributions and complex quantities, particularly in the context of analyzing signals from an antenna array. The conclusion drawn is that the original expression is specific to normally distributed random variables. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate statistical analysis in various applications.
marcusl
Science Advisor
Messages
2,958
Reaction score
668
For multivariate normal distributions, Isserlis' theorem gives us moments in terms of cross-correlations, e.g.,

\operatorname{E}[\,x_1x_2x_3x_4\,] = \operatorname{E}[x_1x_2]\,\operatorname{E}[x_3x_4] + \operatorname{E}[x_1x_3]\,\operatorname{E}[x_2x_4] + \operatorname{E}[x_1x_4]\,\operatorname{E}[x_2x_3] = r_{12}r_{34}+r_{13}r_{24}+r_{14}r_{23}

Does this equation hold generally for non-normal distributions?
And does it change for complex (rather than real) quantities?
I am trying to analyze the complex signals received by an antenna array.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I've figured out the answer to my questions. The fourth-order cumulant (FOC) is given by

<br /> \operatorname{cum}[\,x_1x_2x_3x_4\,] = \operatorname{E}[\,x_1x_2x_3x_4\,] - \operatorname{E}[x_1x_2]\,\operatorname{E}[x_3x_4] - \operatorname{E}[x_1x_3]\,\operatorname{E}[x_2x_4] - \operatorname{E}[x_1x_4]\,\operatorname{E}[x_2x_3]

Note that the first term on the right is the multivariable fourth moment, while the remaining terms are the fourth moment of normally distributed rv's by Isserlis' theorem. We add the following properties of cumulants: the FOC for general random variables is, in general, non-zero, while the FOC for normally distributed random variables is identically zero. Putting these all together, then the expression in my first email must be specific to normally distributed rv's.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

2
Replies
67
Views
14K
Back
Top