| New Reply |
Period and frequency of a pendulum doesn't depend on mass?? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jul28-11, 03:07 PM | #1 |
|
|
Period and frequency of a pendulum doesn't depend on mass??
for a pendulum:
T = 2[itex]\pi[/itex][itex]\sqrt{}length/g[/itex] and f = 1/2[itex]\pi[/itex] [itex]\sqrt{}g/length[/itex] The mass m of the pendulum bob doesn't appear in the formulas for T and f of a pendulum where T = period and f = frequency How does this make sense? If you use a force to push a light child on a swing and use the same force to push a heavy child on a similar swing, the light child should swing faster, right? bc F = mass x acceleration ... so the one with the lighter mass should accelerate faster therefore its frequency should be higher...? but according to those equations, the mass doesn't play a role... why?/ how? |
| Jul28-11, 03:15 PM | #2 |
|
Mentor
|
The more a pendulum weighs, the higher the force it feels. But the more a pendulum weighs, the higher the force needed for a given acceleration. These two effects exactly cancel.
|
| Jul28-11, 03:20 PM | #3 |
|
|
: [itex]f = \frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{g}{l}}[/itex]Take Galileo's-like thought experiment: two identical penduli, oscillating side by side with another. Now put a drop of glue between iron balls - now you have one pendulum of twice bigger mass. Should this drop of glue change their frequency??? |
| Jul28-11, 03:25 PM | #4 |
|
|
Period and frequency of a pendulum doesn't depend on mass??
(wow how did you make that in fraction form? haha)
Conceptually, it makes sense to me that their frequency should change too.... but according to the equation it doesnt change... |
| Jul28-11, 04:08 PM | #5 |
|
|
Well, your concept is wrong! As xts said, if you apply the same force to a lighter child (or pendulum bob) you will give that child a greater acceleration so it will move faster. But that faster speed will result in the child going further. The speed will be greater but the distance traveled will be greater with the net result being that the time taken to travel is constant. The fact that the greater distance traveled at that greater speed is exactly enough to keep the time constant comes from the "conservation of energy".
|
| Jul28-11, 05:06 PM | #6 |
|
Recognitions:
|
The swept angle does affect the time, but not by much until the angle gets large. Wiki article with formulas. Although the article mentions θ in units of degrees, in the infinite series formula, θ is in radians.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pendulum |
| Jul28-11, 05:38 PM | #7 |
|
|
I think i understand your explanation the best. thanks! |
| Jul28-11, 09:49 PM | #8 |
|
Mentor
|
I'm afraid the distance traveled and the speed at which it travels is (for an ideal pendulum) independent of mass. So while it may be the easiest explanation to understand, it does not match the real world.
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Period and frequency of a pendulum doesn't depend on mass??
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| time to stop body in motion depend on its mass? | General Physics | 11 | ||
| Period, the Pendulum and Frequency | Introductory Physics Homework | 5 | ||
| Does Gravity Depend on ratio of mass between objects? | General Physics | 8 | ||
| how does frequency depend on the potential energy? | Classical Physics | 2 | ||
| Conical Pendulum, Mass and Period | Introductory Physics Homework | 2 | ||