Velocity of water out of reservoir.

  • Thread starter Thread starter John09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the efflux speed of water from a cylindrical tank, which is proportional to the square root of the water depth. The formula for velocity is derived as v = sqrt(2*g*h), indicating that the constant k is sqrt(2g). While some participants suggest considering pressure and volume for a more accurate calculation, others argue that these factors may not be necessary for the coursework context. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding dynamic and static pressures in fluid dynamics. Overall, the focus remains on finding an algebraic approach to determine the constant in the efflux speed equation.
John09
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a cylindrical tank and I know that the efflux speed is proportional to the square root of the depth of the hole from the surface. So u=k sqrt(w). I need to algebraically determine the constant or k in that situation. Has anyone got any ideas as to how I should approach this? I was thinking that I could try and find the acceleration in i and j components and integrate it for velocity but didn't get far.

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you're ignoring the viscous effects, the efflux speed will be such that the dynamic pressure is equal to the static pressure just inside the hole. Dynamic pressure is 1/2*rho*v2, so rearranging for v, we can get that v = sqrt(2*p/rho). Since the pressure in a tank is simply from hydrostatic equilibrium (P = rho*g*h), we can plug in for P:

v = sqrt(2*rho*g*h/rho) = sqrt(2*g*h).

So, your constant is sqrt(2g).
 
Hm I don't think taking pressure into account is necessary as it is not part of our coursework.
 
If you want to know the velocity in fluid dynamics you need to know 2 things. Volume and pressure to find velocity. Unless you can invent some kinda new math cjl is right.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top