| Thread Closed |
difference between lorentz invariant and lorentz covariant |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Dec3-04, 04:00 AM | #1 |
|
|
difference between lorentz invariant and lorentz covariant
title says it all. I've heard these two phrases.
Lorentz invariant: Equation (Lagrangian, or ...?) takes same form under lorentz transforms. Lorentz covariant: Equation is in covariant form. I'm don't think I know what I mean when I say the latter. Can someone elucidate the difference between these two. Is there some necessary/sufficient condition that relates the two. Thanks for your help! |
| Dec3-04, 04:31 AM | #2 |
|
|
For example,the D'Alembert operator on flat spacetimes is a scalar:[tex] (\partial^{\mu})'(\partial_{\mu})'=\partial^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}[/tex],where,obviously: [tex] (\partial^{\mu})'=\Lambda^{\mu}\ _{\nu} \partial^{\nu} [/tex]. Any expression written correctly wrt to suffices' position and containing a finite tensor product of tensors defined on the same flat manifold (space-time) is a Lorentz covariant.Arbitrary (but finite) rank tensors are Lorentz covariants,including scalars obtained through a finite number of contraction of suffices in a tensor product. |
| Dec4-04, 01:07 PM | #3 |
|
|
I'm sorry I don't understand that explaniation. Can you give me two examples, and say:
1) Formula , "look at the formula" this is what i mean by lorentz invariant 2) Another Formula, "this is what i mean by lorentz covariant" What I mean is just give an example without so much mathematical jargon |
| Dec4-04, 01:31 PM | #4 |
|
|
difference between lorentz invariant and lorentz covariant
A Lorentz invaraint is a quanirty decsrivbed by a single number and is the same for all inertial observers, an example of this would be mass.
A Lorentz covaraint is a quantity described by 4^n (n = 0,1,2,3,...) numbers whose componets may change unbder transformation but essientially remain the same quantity (to be non-technical), Lorentz invaraints are alos Lorentz covaraint, any four-vector like four-momentum is Lorentz covariant as indeed is any Lorentz tensor. |
| Dec4-04, 01:41 PM | #5 |
|
Recognitions:
|
The Lorentz invariants are a proper subset of the scalar quantities in physics. The Lorentz invariants are also a proper subset of the Lorentz covariants.
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: difference between lorentz invariant and lorentz covariant
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Lorentz-invariant electric charge? | Quantum Physics | 51 | ||
| Is the vacuum stress energy tensor Lorentz invariant ? | Special & General Relativity | 8 | ||
| Lorentz invariant mass of electromagnetic field? | Classical Physics | 9 | ||
| E.H is a Lorentz invariant, when is it different from 0 ? | Classical Physics | 0 | ||
| lorentz invariant | Special & General Relativity | 4 | ||