What is the Cell Potential for Mg/Mg^2+ and Fe/Fe^2+ Electrodes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarcZZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cell Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the cell potential (ECell) for an electrochemical cell using Mg/Mg^2+ and Fe/Fe^2+ electrodes, with given standard reduction potentials of -0.45V for Fe and -2.37V for Mg. The correct formula to use is ECell = EReduction + EOxidation, where the oxidation potential of Mg is considered by changing its sign. The participants debate the correct answer, with one suggesting that the answer is B (1.92V) based on the reasoning of potential values. However, clarification is provided that the calculation involves understanding the distance between the half-cell potentials rather than simply changing signs. The final consensus indicates that the approach to determining ECell is crucial for arriving at the correct answer.
MarcZZ
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the cell potential (ECell) of an electrochemical cell with Mg/Mg^2+, and Fe/Fe^2+ electrodes. [Mg^2+] and [Fe^2+] = 1.00 M.

Fe^2+(aq) + 2e^- --> Fe(s) = -0.45V
Mg^2+(aq) + 2e^- --> Mg(s) = -2.37 V

a) 1.90
b) 1.92
c) 1.94
d) 2.82
e) 2.80


Homework Equations



ECell = EReduction + EOxidation

The Attempt at a Solution



I believe the answer is B as I believe because the Mg having a lower value of V will have it's sign changed to form a positive value (oxidation). Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not about changing a sign. It is a about a distance between the half cell potentials - mark them on the number axis and it will be obvious.

Doesn't mean your answer is incorrect.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top