Electric Field Strength Inside Concentric Uniformly Charged Spheres

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the electric field strength within concentric uniformly charged spheres. Two plausible scenarios are identified: a positively charged nonconducting thin-walled spherical shell inside a positively charged conducting sphere, and a positively charged conducting sphere within another positively charged conducting sphere. The electric field inside a conductor is zero, while it decreases as 1/r² outside the conductor, which explains the graph's behavior. Clarification is sought on conceptualizing the electric field for both scenarios, particularly the implications of the electric field being zero inside a spherical surface charge distribution. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the behavior of electric fields in such configurations.
forestmine
Messages
201
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The graph in the figure shows the electric field strength (not the field lines) as a function of distance from the center for a pair of concentric uniformly charged spheres. Which of the following situations could the graph plausibly represent? (There may be more than one correct choice.)

A positively charged nonconducting thin-walled spherical shell inside of a positively charged conducting sphere.
A positively charged conducting sphere within another positively charged conducting sphere.

c18.5.jpg


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Alright, so I know that the above two are the only plausible situations, but I'm just trying to understand exactly why.

For the second one, I think I understand. The electric field inside a conductor is 0, and outside, it falls off as 1/r^2. The start of the curve along 0 depicts the inside of the conductor, where the negative slope is depicting the space outside of the sphere before it reaches the walls of the sphere containing it? I'm a little confused there...(I hope I'm making some sense at least!)

For the first instance, I'm really confused. I honestly don't know how to conceptualize that one at all.

Any help would be great! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you understand the second instance, you should understand the first. The electric field inside a spherical surface charge distribution is zero regardless of whether the surface is the skin of a conducting sphere or just a skin of some kind on which uniform charge has been pasted.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top