Where do 4 principal states of matter work together?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the interaction of the four principal states of matter—solid, liquid, gas, and plasma—in natural systems. An example provided is the Earth-Sun system, where these states collectively sustain life. The conversation highlights the need for clearer definitions, suggesting that the universe itself could be viewed as a discrete system where all states interact. Additionally, specific conditions like water at its triple point and gas-plasma discharge tubes demonstrate practical examples of these states working together. The question remains broad, indicating numerous potential scenarios in nature.
phy666
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
speaking of solid, liquid, gas, and plasma, where in nature do these four states of matter interact to form a discrete system?

the only example i know of, with my limited knowledge, is sun (plasma), Earth (solid), sea (liquid), and sky (gas) ... all work together to form something like a "gaia" system which sustains biomass. this may be a bit too novel, I'm just wondering if there are places in nature where these four principal states of matter work together, perhaps in a type of cell, engine, or some astrophysical phenomena.

strange question. I know this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The solar system is not closed.
I think you need to more closely define your terms ... as it stands, "the Universe" would fit your description of a discrete system where all states of matter "work together". Also "a type of cell or engine" is not usually thought of as a "place in nature" - though it handily opens the question to the possibility of engineering the situation you are asking about.

Note:
you can get a solid-liquid-gas system in equilibrium (i.e. water at it's triple-point.)
gas-plasma discharge tubes have a gas and plasma (+ electric field) working together ... add ice to the chamber and you have your condition.

See? The question, as stated, is so vague there are probably infinite possibilities.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top