Calculating Acceleration: Understanding Horizontal Forces on a 3kg Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter RadiationX
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A 3kg mass is subjected to two horizontal forces: 9.0 N due east and 8.0 N at 62 degrees north of west. The book states that the resulting acceleration is 2.9 m/s^2, which some participants question based on their calculations. The discussion highlights the importance of considering both components of the second force, specifically the northward component, which is often overlooked. It emphasizes that both x and y components can be analyzed separately or combined using trigonometry to arrive at the correct answer. Understanding these components is crucial for accurate calculations of acceleration.
RadiationX
Messages
255
Reaction score
0
only two horozontal forces act on a 3kg mass. one force is 9.0 N acting due east, and the other is 8.0 N acting 62 degrees north of west. what is the magintude of the body's acceleration.


The answer in the book is 2.9 m/s^2. but how can this be?

shouldn't the solution be (9 + 8cos(118))/3 = 1.74808 m/s^2 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you are missing a component of the force

Sure you got that first part right but you're missing the fact that there is ANOTHER COMPONENT of force being appleid on this object. You decomposed that 8N force in 8cos 62 and 8sin62 what hapopened to the 8sin62?
 
What about the northward component of the second force?

The book's answer is correct.
 
damn is all i can say
 
You can deal with x and y components separately as you did, or you can use trigonometry to add the two force vectors.
 
"i can't be this dumb. can i? "

Don't ask questions like that! You might not like the answers!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top