Finding distance of point to y-axis.

  • Thread starter Thread starter V0ODO0CH1LD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point
AI Thread Summary
In a Cartesian coordinate system, two lines intersect at the origin, with slopes of 2 and 1/2. Points B and C lie on these lines in the first quadrant, and the segment BC is perpendicular to line r, forming triangle OBC with an area of 12/10. The relationship between the lengths of segments OB and BC is established, but the solver struggles to find a missing theorem or property to simplify the problem. The coordinates of points B and C are expressed in terms of their x-values, leading to a complex equation involving multiple unknowns. The discussion highlights the need for an additional equation to solve for the distance from point B to the y-axis.
V0ODO0CH1LD
Messages
278
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a cartesian coordinate system, two lines r and s, with angular coefficients 2 and 1/2, respectively, intercept at the origin. If B \in r and C \in s are two points in the first quadrant such that the line segment BC is perpendicular to r and the area of the triangle OBC is 12x10-1, then what is the distance from point B to the y axis?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, first I found the relationship between OC and BC using the formula for the area of a triangle:
[OBC] = 12x10-1 = 12/10 = 6/5 = (OB BC)/2

Now I am stuck. Whatever I do it seems like I am going around in circles..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
|OB| and |OC| don't have to be the same length.
But you do know that [OBC] forms a special kind of triangle, and you know one of the apex angles.

You also need a point Q=(0,y) and look at the triangle [OBQ].
You know one of these apex angles too.
 
Simon Bridge said:
|OB| and |OC| don't have to be the same length.

Yeah, I know. But the relationship between |BC| and |OB| is that |BC| = 12/(5|OB|); right?

Simon Bridge said:
But you do know that [OBC] forms a special kind of triangle, and you know one of the apex angles.

I did find all the angles of the triangle OBC, but they're not your usual angles and since this problem was taken from a test where calculators are not allowed, you kind of know you're going the wrong way..

I think I am actually missing some sort of theorem or property that would make this whole problem easier, but I have no idea which.
 
Reformulating - you want the x-coordinate of point B.
 
... so, rewrite everything in terms of coordinates:

##y_r=2x, y_s=\frac{1}{2}x## ... right?
So the position of the ponts B and C can be writen:
##\vec{B}=(x_b, y_b)=(1,2)x_b##
##\vec{C}=(x_c,y_c)=(2,1)x_c##

... and the area of the triangle [OBC] is:
##A=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{x_b^2+y_b^2}\sqrt{(x_b-x_c)^2+(y_b-y_c)^2}##

... that's three equations and four unknowns: you need one more equation: the line through B perpendicular to r, or Pythagoras on the sides of [OBC]?
 
Last edited:
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top