What Makes Iron Effective at Blocking Radiation Compared to Lead?

AI Thread Summary
Iron is less effective than lead for blocking and absorbing radiation due to its higher radiation length, making lead superior in density and mass. Specifically, lead has a radiation length of 6.37 g cm-2, while iron's is 13.84 g cm-2, indicating lead's greater efficiency against high photon energies, particularly over 100 keV. For low-energy photons, the effectiveness of both materials varies based on the specific energy levels involved. Overall, lead is the preferred choice for radiation shielding, especially for X-rays and gamma radiation. Understanding these differences is crucial for selecting appropriate materials for radiation protection.
znc03
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know how Iron compares to lead as a medium to block / absorb radiation? Do you know what wavelengths or spectrum iron is most effective against?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Photon radiation? In other words, X-rays and gamma radiation?
Lead is better per mass, and has a higher density in addition (so it is much better per length).
For high photon energies (>100keV), the radiation length is the relevant quantity. You can find numbers at the particle data group.

Iron: Radiation length 13.84 g -2 or 1.757 cm
Lead: Radiation length 6.37 g cm-2 or 0.5612 cm

For low-energy photons, it depends on the energy.
 
Back
Top