finding dimensions of a rectangle.


by rcmango
Tags: dimensions, rectangle
rcmango
rcmango is offline
#1
Dec8-12, 05:19 AM
P: 238
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

the perimeter of a rectangle is 24 ft. the length is 4 ft longer than the width find the dimensions

width x
length x+4

however, I should be doing it like this:

a first equation should start like: 2x+2y=?

and the second should start like x=y+?

so whats the length and the width?

2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution

x + x + (x+4)+(x+4) = 24
4x+8=24
-8 -8

4x = 16
4x/4 = 16/4

x = 4

so width 4 ft
and length 4+4, so 8 ft.
makes sense, since length should be greater than width.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Scientists pinpoint when harmless bacteria became flesh-eating monsters
Asian air pollution affect Pacific Ocean storms
Rocket leak delays space station delivery launch (Update)
phinds
phinds is offline
#2
Dec8-12, 07:38 AM
PF Gold
phinds's Avatar
P: 5,674
x + x + (x+4)+(x+4) = 24

x = 4

exactly
Ray Vickson
Ray Vickson is offline
#3
Dec8-12, 12:52 PM
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 4,662
Quote Quote by rcmango View Post
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

the perimeter of a rectangle is 24 ft. the length is 4 ft longer than the width find the dimensions

width x
length x+4

however, I should be doing it like this:

a first equation should start like: 2x+2y=?

and the second should start like x=y+?

so whats the length and the width?

2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution

x + x + (x+4)+(x+4) = 24
4x+8=24
-8 -8

4x = 16
4x/4 = 16/4

x = 4

so width 4 ft
and length 4+4, so 8 ft.
makes sense, since length should be greater than width.
Why do you say you "should be doing it like this:"? There is no *should*---any correct method is OK. Doing it two ways might be helpful towards learning goals, but it is not necessary for correct presentation of the solution.

Michael Redei
Michael Redei is offline
#4
Dec8-12, 01:21 PM
P: 181

finding dimensions of a rectangle.


If you've learned one way of solving problems of this kind, and you're expected to show that you have, in fact, understood the technique, then you probably should be doing just what you are, namely translating the facts bit by bit into equations, i.e.
  • "rectangle" suggests the equation 2x + 2y = 24
  • "width versus height" remark means y = x + 4
If you're just interested in the answer, any method will do, for instance this one, which I'll call "guess and revise":

Start with any width you like, say 7. Then the length will be 4 more, so 11. This gives you a perimeter of 7+7+11+11 = 36.

Oops, that's 12 too much. Let's subtract this "extra" length from the four sides, taking 12/4 = 3 away from each: width now is 7-3 = 4, and length is 11-3 = 8.
rcmango
rcmango is offline
#5
Dec9-12, 06:51 AM
P: 238
thankyou phinds for confirming.

Thanks for completing those equations Michael Redei, i seen them done that way and I didn't understand it, its much more clear now.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Solving for perimeter and dimensions of a rectangle Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Finding the dimensions of a rotated rectangle inside another rectangle. Precalculus Mathematics Homework 8
finding rectangle in a plane Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Finding Max Area of Rectangle in Isos. Triangle Calculus & Beyond Homework 6
Mapping a generic quadrilateral onto a rectangle (in 2 dimensions) General Math 0