Chemistry Questions concerning Kinetic Molecular Theory

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on Kinetic Molecular Theory, it is established that two gases, A and B, in equal volume at the same temperature and pressure can be compared based on their masses. The number of molecules in both gases is equal due to Avogadro's Law, making statement a true. The molar mass of gas B is greater than that of gas A, confirming statement b as false. Both gases have the same average kinetic energy, validating statement c, while statement d is false since gas A has a higher average velocity. Finally, statement e is true, as gas A collides with the container walls more frequently to exert the same pressure as gas B.
9781133886563
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider two gases, A and B, in containers of equal volume. Both have the same temperature and pressure. Mass of A = 0.34 g and Mass of B = 0.48 g

True or False: (justify your answer)
a. The number of molecules of A is equal to the number of molecules of B.
b. The molar mass of A is greater than the molar mass of B.
c. Both samples have the same average kinetic energy.
d. The molecules of A have the same average velocity as the molecules of B.
e. The molecules of A collide with the container walls more frequently than the molecules of B.

2. The attempt at a solution

a. True, both containers have the same volume. According to Avogadro's Law, equal volumes of gases at the same temperature and pressure contain the same number of particles.
b. False, container B has a larger overall mass with the same amount of molecules as A, therefore it must have a larger molar mass
c. True, the temperature of both containers is equal. (The kinetic energy of A is equal to B. Although the molecules of A are lighter, they are moving faster)
d. False, the average velocity of A is higher than that of B.
e. True, the molecules in A must collide more frequently in order to exert the same amount of pressure as B.

Am I correct in my reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think all are right.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top