Atwood's pulley-moment of inertia

  • Thread starter Thread starter flower76
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an experiment using an Atwood's pulley system with two different masses and an accelerating cart on a horizontal surface. The experiment aimed to calculate the moment of inertia, revealing that the moment of inertia for the accelerating cart is significantly smaller than that of the Atwood's pulley. Participants question whether the moment of inertia should be the same since the same pulley is used, and they explore the implications of force differences due to the setup. One explanation suggests that the orientation of the forces and the effects of gravity on the suspended mass might influence the results. The conversation seeks clarity on the calculations and the underlying physics principles involved.
flower76
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Ok I've done an experiment in which both a standard Atwood's pulley was used, two different masses suspended on either side of the pulley. And an accelerating cart, where the cart was on a horizontal surface, and a weight was attached on the other side of the pulley hanging down. The mass was kept constant by transferring weight from one mass to the other.

From the experimental data I made graphs of force vs acceleration, and was able to calculate the moment of inertia.

Here is my question, I found that the moment of inertia found for the accelerating car is considerably smaller than for the Atwood’s pulley. But I really don't know how to explain the significance of this.

Anyone know?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if you used the same pulley, shouldn't the moment of inertia be the same??

For a circular disc the Moment of inertia is I = \frac{1}{2} ML^2 where L is the radial vector about which the torque is exerted. But in btoh your described cases the moment of inertia is the same since the string is wrapped around the pulley's end (am i right in assuming this?)

Perhasp you have made an error in calculations?
 
One is suspended over and therefore the force is based on the mass difference between the weights. And in the other case, because the horizontal surface is perpendicular to the movement of m2 which is suspended on the other side, the force is only a result of m2 and gravity. This somehow changes the acceleration, and therefore the inertia. I think?

Anyone know if I'm on the right track here?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top