Rod + 2 Particle masses = angular acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the angular acceleration of a rotating rod with attached particles. The moment of inertia was initially calculated incorrectly, as the inertia of particles should be determined using the formula mr² instead of mr. The net torque was derived from the gravitational forces acting on the particles, but it was emphasized that each particle's torque should be considered individually rather than just the net force. The angle between the radius and the force was debated, with clarification that both angles yield the same torque. The thread concludes with a focus on correcting the moment of inertia and torque calculations to find the accurate angular acceleration.
ninjagowoowoo
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
PROBLEM:
A rigid rod of mass 8.70 kg and length 2.30 m rotates in a vertical (x,y) plane about a frictionless pivot through its center. Particles m1 (mass=4.30 kg) and m2 (mass=2.60 kg) are attached at the ends of the rod. Determine the size of the angular acceleration of the system when the rod makes an angle of 50.1° with the horizontal.

I tried getting the moment of inertia using Irod = 1/12ML^2 + the Is of both the particles. Then I found the weight difference and used that to compute torque in torque = r x F. Finally I used those two answers to get angular acceleration. Of course this is wrong... can someone help me please? Or at least tell me what I did wrong... I think I may be confused about the angle between r and F. Anyway, any help would be apperciated! Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i have that problem for my physics hwk too :smile:
 
haha, do you go to UCSB?
 
ninjagowoowoo said:
I tried getting the moment of inertia using Irod = 1/12ML^2 + the Is of both the particles. Then I found the weight difference and used that to compute torque in torque = r x F. Finally I used those two answers to get angular acceleration. Of course this is wrong... can someone help me please? Or at least tell me what I did wrong... I think I may be confused about the angle between r and F.
This should work just fine. Show in detail what you did and then we can try to spot any errors.
 
Irod = (1/12)ML^2 = (1/12)(8.7kg)(2.3^2)=3.83525
Iparticles = m1r1 + m2r2 = 4.3(1.15) + 2.60(1.15) = 7.935
Inet = 11.77025

Force due to gravity(net) = m1g - m2g = 42.14N - 25.48N = 16.66 N

Now this is the part where i think i may be wrong:

since the angle between r and the horizontal is 50.1 deg, then the angle between r and F is 140.1 deg.:confused:(I did try it with 50.1 deg and still no luck.)

Thus:
torque = rF(sin140.1)= 12.28953349

torque = I(alpha) = 12.28953349 = 11.77025(alpha)
so alpha = 1.04411 rad/s/s

which is wrong... is my angle wrong or is there more to it than that? Thanks for the help.
 
Last edited:
ninjagowoowoo said:
Irod = (1/12)ML^2 = (1/12)(8.7kg)(2.3^2)=3.83525
Iparticles = m1r1 + m2r2 = 4.3(1.15) + 2.60(1.15) = 7.935
Here's your error: the moment of inertia of a particle is mr^2, not mr.

Force due to gravity(net) = m1g - m2g = 42.14N - 25.48N = 16.66 N
Subtracting the weights of the two particles to find the net force is a shortcut that is OK here, since they happen to be equidistant from the pivot point. But each particle should be thought of as exerting its own torque, not just its own weight. You need to find the net torque, not the net force.
...
Now this is the part where i think i may be wrong:

since the angle between r and the horizontal is 50.1 deg, then the angle between r and F is 140.1 deg.
That's perfectly OK. Since you don't know whether the heavier particle is above or below the horizontal, the angle could be 140.1 deg or 39.9 deg. But it doesn't matter, the torque is the same.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top