Electric potential at the center of a sphere

AI Thread Summary
The electric field at the surface of a charged copper sphere is 2800 N/C, directed inward, indicating a negative charge enclosed. The potential at the center of the sphere was calculated as 722V, but the sign was missed due to the negative charge. It is clarified that the potential is negative because the electric field direction suggests negative charge. Additionally, the potential remains constant throughout the metal sphere. Therefore, the potential at the center is negative relative to infinity.
Yosty22
Messages
182
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



The electric field at the surface of a charged, solid, copper sphere with radius 0.19m is 2800 N/C , directed toward the center of the sphere.

What is the potential at the center of the sphere, if we take the potential to be zero infinitely far from the sphere?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I got the correct answer, but missed the sign.

What I did was:

I know that the electric field is 3800 N/C at the surface, and I know the radius, so I calculated the electric flux through the sphere. I found the flux to be 1723.85 Vm. Then, I solved for Q_enc and found it to be 1.526*10^-8 C. Then, I used the equation V = 1/(4pi\epsilon_0)*∫dq/r to find that the potential is 722V.

My question:

The question states that the electric field points to the center of the sphere, implying the charge enclosed is negative. Is this why the potential is negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yosty22 said:

Homework Statement



The electric field at the surface of a charged, solid, copper sphere with radius 0.19m is 2800 N/C , directed toward the center of the sphere.

What is the potential at the center of the sphere, if we take the potential to be zero infinitely far from the sphere?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I got the correct answer, but missed the sign.

What I did was:

I know that the electric field is 3800 N/C at the surface, and I know the radius, so I calculated the electric flux through the sphere. I found the flux to be 1723.85 Vm. Then, I solved for Q_enc and found it to be 1.526*10^-8 C. Then, I used the equation V = 1/(4pi\epsilon_0)*∫dq/r to find that the potential is 722V.

My question:

The question states that the electric field points to the center of the sphere, implying the charge enclosed is negative. Is this why the potential is negative?

Yes, the inward electric field means enclosed negative charge, which has negative potential with respect to infinity.

You calculated the potential at the surface of the metal sphere. When writing the answer, add that the potential is the same through the metal.

ehild
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top