What Innovative Concepts Can Enhance Bungee Jumping Physics Research?

AI Thread Summary
Innovative concepts for enhancing bungee jumping physics research include exploring the effects of friction during jumps and experimenting with bungee jumping in water environments. Additional suggestions focus on analyzing the elasticity of different bungee cords and the impact of varying jump heights on the experience. Researchers are encouraged to consider the dynamics of air resistance and potential safety measures. Clarifying the specific problem statement could further refine the direction of the research. Engaging with these concepts can lead to a deeper understanding of the physics involved in bungee jumping.
th3whit3fang
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have been doing a research around the physics behind bungeejumping and i need some new ideas. Some of the ideas i already have done are: 1) friction while bungee jumping 2) bunjee jumping (but in water instead of just air) ...

i need some creative ideas for my reasearch.

thank you,
srijan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
th3whit3fang said:
I have been doing a research around the physics behind bungeejumping and i need some new ideas. Some of the ideas i already have done are: 1) friction while bungee jumping 2) bunjee jumping (but in water instead of just air) ...

i need some creative ideas for my reasearch.

thank you,
srijan

Is this for schoolwork? What is the exact problem statement?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top