Maximum size of a set containing logical expressions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the maximum size of a set A of logical expressions using the symbols →, p, and q, where no two expressions are equivalent. A participant suggests that there are six different possible truth values and questions whether this is indeed the maximum size, seeking proof. Another contributor proposes a method to generate new truth tables by examining pairs of existing expressions in the form "A_i → A_j". By starting with basic expressions like p and q, they suggest expanding the set and checking for new truth tables until no further unique tables can be created. The conversation emphasizes the challenge of proving the maximum size of such a set.
alejandro7
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi

Can you please help me with this problem?


"What is the maximum size of a set A of logical expressions that only use →, p, q : each pair of elements of A are not equivalent?"

I've found 6 different possible truth values. Is this the maximum size? If yes, how do I prove it?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alejandro7 said:
I've found 6 different possible truth values.

Perhaps you mean "truth tables".

Is this the maximum size? If yes, how do I prove it?

I haven't worked the problem. I don't see an elegant way to prove it.

If you have a set of truth tables for propositional functions A_1, A_2,..A_N that are each functions of (p,q) then you can attempt to produce functions with a new truth tables by looking at all possible pairs of statements of the form "A_i -> A_j".

Beginning with A_1 = p, A_2= q, N=2, you would examine p ->p , p ->q, q->q, q->p.

Adding any functions that have new truth tables, you form a larger set. Then try to produce new truth tables from the larger set in a similar manner. If you generate a set where no new tables can be produced by the above method, I'd say you have the largest possible set of functions involving only p,q, and ->.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top