RELAP fuel rod-coolant response modeling

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the direct moderator heating multiplier in heat transfer between a fuel rod and coolant. This multiplier represents the fraction of heat delivered directly to the coolant from neutrons and gamma rays, typically a constant based on reactor type. For Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs), the value is generally 97.4%, indicating that 2.6% of heat is attributed to the moderator. In contrast, CANDU reactors use a lower value of 92.5% for heat-to-fuel ratio, likely due to a higher fuel ratio in light water reactors (LWRs). This highlights the differences in heat transfer characteristics between various reactor designs.
Vnt666Skr
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am a beginner with the use of relap. So this might be a bit silly. I am studying the heat transfer between a fuel rod and a single channel of coolant. One of the inputs for the heat structure is the direct moderator heating multiplier. What is that and how do I find its value?

Thanks. Any help or advice will be greatly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I presume that is the fraction of heat delivered directly to the coolant, i.e. from neutrons and gamma rays. This is generally a constant only dependent on reactor type. For PWR's we use 97.4% for fraction of heat generated in the fuel (moderator would thus be 2.6%).
 
Thanks QuantumPion ! :)
 
QuantumPion said:
I presume that is the fraction of heat delivered directly to the coolant, i.e. from neutrons and gamma rays. This is generally a constant only dependent on reactor type. For PWR's we use 97.4% for fraction of heat generated in the fuel (moderator would thus be 2.6%).

I know for CANDU's we normally use a value of 92.5% heat-to-fuel/energy released. It is interesting that it is so much lower than PWR's. Presumably this is because LWRs have a higher ratio of fuel in the core.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top