Thread Closed

this can not be so easy

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Apr4-03, 09:24 AM   #1
 

this can not be so easy


suppose we want to solve the integral equation

g(x)=Int(-1,1)exp(-xy)f(y)dy (2) then this is equal to

g(x)=Int(-infinite,infinite)exp(-xy)f(y)W(y)dy where the W(y) function is defined like that:

W(y) is 1 iif -1<y<1 and 0 elsewhere.

then we would have that the equation (2) is a fourier transform and inverting we can get f(x)W(x).


Is all that?..i can not believe that solving an integral equation could be so easy...
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
mathematics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Mathematicians analyze social divisions using cell phone data
>> Can math models of gaming strategies be used to detect terrorism networks?
>> Mathematician proves there are infinitely many pairs of prime numbers less than 70 million units apart
Apr4-03, 10:23 AM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
I'm afraid I don't quite understand your question.

You refer to g(x)=Int(-1,1)exp(-xy)f(y)dy as an "integral equation" so I presume you mean that g is given and you want to find f.

How does converting to the integral from -inf to inf make this a Fourier transform? Doesn't the Fourier transform have an exp(-ixy) in it?
Apr5-03, 06:18 AM   #3
 
think he forgot the i in the exp
but i don't know if you can add the W(y)
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: this can not be so easy
Thread Forum Replies
Easy Derivative - Not easy for me, though! Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Guys, I have 4 easy questions. (probably easy to you) Introductory Physics Homework 32
Easy gauss' law question that I wanna make sure I didn't make too easy Advanced Physics Homework 0
Something easy. Brain Teasers 4
Easy, easy question--please help... Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 1