Scientists' EQ: Analyzing Situations & Necessary EQ Levels

  • Thread starter Thread starter asdf1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Levels Scientist
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between scientists' analytical skills and their emotional intelligence (EQ). It suggests that while scientists excel in objective analysis, their emotional quotient may not be as developed due to the nature of scientific work, which prioritizes logic and rationality over emotional considerations. The conversation highlights that science is less subjective than fields like the humanities, allowing scientists to operate effectively even with minimal emotional engagement. Additionally, it humorously notes that an overly logical approach could hinder personal relationships, implying that a balance between emotion and logic is essential in life beyond scientific endeavors.
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
if scientists are good at analyzing situtations, why aren't their EQ neccesary all that great?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EQ?

IQ?

If you mean IQ, then it's because IQ is worthless and the tests are flawed.

PL
 
The reference to EQ is probably referring to an "Emotional Quotient."

Science isn't really a subjective field like the humanities, so it doesn't really need to consider the emotional factor as much as objective rationalization is needed in scientific endeavours. One can be a chemist/physicist/mathematician and careless about emotions, as it isn't pertinent to their work in general; that coupled with (generally) the scientific nature to be overtly logical and practical.

Adding to that... theoretically scientists could then function in their pursuit of science if they were overly Spockish and had no emotion whatsoever, but then the scientists wouldn't have wives/husbands. :rolleyes:
 
haha... that's true~
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
950
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top