Help With Half Reaction/Redox Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter erok81
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on balancing the redox reaction of FeI3 and Mg using the half-reaction method. The initial attempt incorrectly identifies the half-reactions and the roles of the oxidizing and reducing agents. Correctly, Fe^3+ is reduced to Fe, while Mg is oxidized to Mg^2+. The final balanced equation is 2Fe^3+(aq) + 3Mg(s) → 2Fe(s) + 3Mg^2+(aq), with I^- identified as the spectator ion. The importance of ensuring that the electrons gained equal the electrons lost is emphasized for proper balancing.
erok81
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me with this? I have my entire homework section done except for this. For some reason, even on the previous test, I cannot figure out how to do these.
Here is the question. I hope I get this right, I haven't used LaTeX on this site much.:confused:

Balance the following oxidation-reduction reactions by the half-reaction method.

Ok, the LaTeX keeps saying reload page, I have been trying for the last 15 minutes and I can't get it to show up. So, I'll try it without.:-p


FeI3(aq) + Mg(s) ---> Fe(s) + MgI2(aq)

Be sure to indicate the spectator ions, the oxidation reaction, the reduction reaction, the reducing agent, the oxidizing agent.


Here is what I have so far:

Half reactions:
Fe^3+(aq) ---> Fe(s) + 3e- = Oxidizing Reaction/Reducing Agent.
2e- + Mg(s) ---> Mg(aq) = Reducing Reaction/Oxidizing Agent.

Balanced equation:
2FeI3(aq) + 3Mg(s) ---> 2Fe(s) + 3MgI2(aq)

I have the spectator ion as Iodine.

I am pretty sure most of this is wrong, as I have no clue how to do these. If someone could help me out/point me in the right direction, I would appreciate it.
If you have any questions about it, or need more info, let me know.
Thanks.:biggrin:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
science FeI3 and MgI2 are in an aqueous solution they split like this Fe^+3 + I^-1 and Mg^+2 + I^-1 the I^-1 are the spectator ions so they cancle out
your left with Fe^+3(aq) + Mg(s) ===> Fe(s) + Mg^+2(aq), the half reactions are as follows

Fe^+3(aq) + 3e- ===> Fe(s)/reducing half reaction therefore Fe^+3(aq) is the oxidizing agent

Mg(s) ===> Mg^+2(aq) + 2e-/oxidizing half reaction therefore Mg(s) is the reducing agent

the electrons gained must = electrons lost, so we multiply the half reactions by the lcd of the electrons/lost/gained before combining them

2*(Fe^+3(aq) + 3e- ===> Fe(s))
3*(Mg(s) ===> Mg^+2(aq) + 2e-)
-----------------------------
2Fe^+3(aq) + 6e- ===> 2Fe(s)
3Mg(s) ===> 3Mg^+2(aq) + 6e-
-----------------------------
2Fe^+3(aq) + 3Mg(s) ===> 2Fe(s) + 3Mg^+2(aq)
to check we have the same net-charge(+6) and elements on both sides of the chemical equation
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looks like I almost had it. By almost had it I mean not even close.:smile:

Thanks for the help.:biggrin:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top