Help With Half Reaction/Redox Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter erok81
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on balancing the redox reaction of FeI3 and Mg using the half-reaction method. The initial attempt incorrectly identifies the half-reactions and the roles of the oxidizing and reducing agents. Correctly, Fe^3+ is reduced to Fe, while Mg is oxidized to Mg^2+. The final balanced equation is 2Fe^3+(aq) + 3Mg(s) → 2Fe(s) + 3Mg^2+(aq), with I^- identified as the spectator ion. The importance of ensuring that the electrons gained equal the electrons lost is emphasized for proper balancing.
erok81
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me with this? I have my entire homework section done except for this. For some reason, even on the previous test, I cannot figure out how to do these.
Here is the question. I hope I get this right, I haven't used LaTeX on this site much.:confused:

Balance the following oxidation-reduction reactions by the half-reaction method.

Ok, the LaTeX keeps saying reload page, I have been trying for the last 15 minutes and I can't get it to show up. So, I'll try it without.:-p


FeI3(aq) + Mg(s) ---> Fe(s) + MgI2(aq)

Be sure to indicate the spectator ions, the oxidation reaction, the reduction reaction, the reducing agent, the oxidizing agent.


Here is what I have so far:

Half reactions:
Fe^3+(aq) ---> Fe(s) + 3e- = Oxidizing Reaction/Reducing Agent.
2e- + Mg(s) ---> Mg(aq) = Reducing Reaction/Oxidizing Agent.

Balanced equation:
2FeI3(aq) + 3Mg(s) ---> 2Fe(s) + 3MgI2(aq)

I have the spectator ion as Iodine.

I am pretty sure most of this is wrong, as I have no clue how to do these. If someone could help me out/point me in the right direction, I would appreciate it.
If you have any questions about it, or need more info, let me know.
Thanks.:biggrin:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
science FeI3 and MgI2 are in an aqueous solution they split like this Fe^+3 + I^-1 and Mg^+2 + I^-1 the I^-1 are the spectator ions so they cancle out
your left with Fe^+3(aq) + Mg(s) ===> Fe(s) + Mg^+2(aq), the half reactions are as follows

Fe^+3(aq) + 3e- ===> Fe(s)/reducing half reaction therefore Fe^+3(aq) is the oxidizing agent

Mg(s) ===> Mg^+2(aq) + 2e-/oxidizing half reaction therefore Mg(s) is the reducing agent

the electrons gained must = electrons lost, so we multiply the half reactions by the lcd of the electrons/lost/gained before combining them

2*(Fe^+3(aq) + 3e- ===> Fe(s))
3*(Mg(s) ===> Mg^+2(aq) + 2e-)
-----------------------------
2Fe^+3(aq) + 6e- ===> 2Fe(s)
3Mg(s) ===> 3Mg^+2(aq) + 6e-
-----------------------------
2Fe^+3(aq) + 3Mg(s) ===> 2Fe(s) + 3Mg^+2(aq)
to check we have the same net-charge(+6) and elements on both sides of the chemical equation
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looks like I almost had it. By almost had it I mean not even close.:smile:

Thanks for the help.:biggrin:
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Thread 'How to find the pH of a galvanic cell (MIT OCW problem set)'
This is the final problem in this problem set from MIT OCW. Here is what I did to try to solve it The table cited in the problem is below We can easily spot the two redox couples that are in the electrochemical cell we are given. The hydrogen-based electrode has standard potential zero, and the silver-based electrode has standard potential 0.22. Thus, the hydrogen electrode, with the lower potential, is the reducing agent (ie, it is where oxidation happens) and is the anode. Electrons...
Back
Top