A deeper explenation of a pulley

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mad_Eye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explains the mechanics of a pulley system, focusing on the forces involved. It establishes that the block exerts a downward force equal to its weight (mg) on the pulley. For the pulley to remain at rest, the rope must exert an equal upward force, leading to the conclusion that the tension in the rope (F) is half of the weight of the block (F = mg/2). The other half of the weight is supported by the ceiling. This analysis illustrates the balance of forces in a static pulley system.
Mad_Eye
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
hi,

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/6325/23606963.png

so, if I'm not deadly wrong F here equals only to half m*g... and yeah, i can kind of feel it... but can anyone proof it and explain it to me..?

thanks a lot :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. The block exerts a force equal to mg downwards on the pulley.

2. If the pulley is to be at rest, the portion of the rope in touch with it must exert a total force of mg upwards on the pulley.

3. Thus, by Newton's 3.law, the pulley exerts a force of mg downwards on the portion of the rope it is in contact with.

4. Thus, if the contact portion of the rope is to be at rest, the two vertical strands of the rope must exert a total force of mg on the contact portion of the rope.

5. Since the tension in the rope is equal at all points, it must equal F, and thus, the two strands exerts a force 2*F on the contact portion of the rope.

6. We have from 4 and 5 the equation 2*F=mg, yielding F=mg/2.

7. The other half of mg is provided by the ceiling.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top