- #1
Tangeton
- 62
- 0
Okay so I have a problem with what my textbook is saying.
It defined pair production as a process in which a photon of electromagnetic energy is converted to a pair of particles.
But then it gave the discovery of an antiproton. Which was when a proton was accelerated to 6MeV and collided into a stationary proton, making one antiproton and 3 protons.
So, does this p + p --> p + p + antip process count as pair production? In which case, would the definition of pair production be a bit different?
Also, I found a website on which it says that ''sometimes, a pair of particles annihilates, but then the photon produces another pair of particles.'' When it comes the the first line, is this basically when a pair annihilates, but then the photon still has a lot of energy due to the extra kinetic energy of the particle and its antiparticle, meaning that when it passes close to a nucleus?
Edit: It also says that a antip + p = n + antin Is this besically an example of what I just wrote above (particles annihilate but then the photon produces another pair of particles)?
Sorry for lots of questions and thank you for your time.
It defined pair production as a process in which a photon of electromagnetic energy is converted to a pair of particles.
But then it gave the discovery of an antiproton. Which was when a proton was accelerated to 6MeV and collided into a stationary proton, making one antiproton and 3 protons.
So, does this p + p --> p + p + antip process count as pair production? In which case, would the definition of pair production be a bit different?
Also, I found a website on which it says that ''sometimes, a pair of particles annihilates, but then the photon produces another pair of particles.'' When it comes the the first line, is this basically when a pair annihilates, but then the photon still has a lot of energy due to the extra kinetic energy of the particle and its antiparticle, meaning that when it passes close to a nucleus?
Edit: It also says that a antip + p = n + antin Is this besically an example of what I just wrote above (particles annihilate but then the photon produces another pair of particles)?
Sorry for lots of questions and thank you for your time.