An analytic expression to describe spherical aberration

AI Thread Summary
An analytic expression for the distance from the vertex to the focus of a concave mirror can be derived using the radius of curvature and the angle of incidence. As rays approach the outer edge of the mirror, the angle of incidence increases, causing the focus to move closer to the mirror. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the law of reflection and basic trigonometric identities in this derivation. A specific equation, cos θ = ½R/(R-f), is emphasized as a key result that can be derived from geometrical considerations. The conversation concludes with a resolution to the initial confusion regarding the derivation process.
Nabin kalauni
Messages
26
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Derive an analytic expression for the distance from the vertex to the focus for a particular ray in terms of (i) the radius of curvature R of the concave mirror (ii) the angle of incidence θ between incident ray and radius of the mirror. Hence show that the focus moves closer to the mirror as rays move towards the outer edge of a concave mirror.

Homework Equations


A. The law of reflection
B. Some basic trigonoteric identities

The Attempt at a Solution


I considered a ray parallel to the optic axis and a height h above the axis. The reflected ray meets the axis at a distance f from the vertex. The sketch is linked to the thread.
I could see pretty easily that θ increases as we take a ray further from the axis. As a result, the point D moves closer to the vertex. But I could not derive a mathematical expression. So I looked at the solution and they used quite a few approximations that baffled me like cos θ = ½R/(R-f). How can we get this identity from the given sketch and what approximations do we use?
view
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nabin kalauni said:
So I looked at the solution and they used quite a few approximations that baffled me like cos θ = ½R/(R-f). How can we get this identity from the given sketch and what approximations do we use?
view
The equation you mentioned is not an approximation and can be derived from simple geometrical considerations. Perhaps if you posted the diagram you used, we will be able to diagnose where your problem lies.
 
kuruman said:
The equation you mentioned is not an approximation and can be derived from simple geometrical considerations. Perhaps if you posted the diagram you used, we will be able to diagnose where your problem lies.
I have diagnosed my problem. Thank you.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
I was thinking using 2 purple mattress samples, and taping them together, I do want other ideas though, the main guidelines are; Must have a volume LESS than 1600 cubic centimeters, and CAN'T exceed 25 cm in ANY direction. Must be LESS than 1 kg. NO parachutes. NO glue or Tape can touch the egg. MUST be able to take egg out in less than 1 minute. Grade A large eggs will be used.
Back
Top