MHB Area of Triangle ABC: Find the Answer Here

  • Thread starter Thread starter ketanco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Triangle
AI Thread Summary
The area of triangle ABC is confirmed to be 18. A participant discusses the relationship between the areas of triangles ACD and ABD, noting that ACD's area is three times that of ABD. Suggestions are made to extend line AC to point E, creating a similarity between triangles ACD and ECB. The conversation includes geometric coordinates and calculations to support the findings. Overall, the thread focuses on determining the area of triangle ABC through geometric relationships.
ketanco
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
what is the area of triangle ABC in the attached? answer is 18

i can not construct any similar triangles here. all i can see is area of ACD is 3 times area of ABD but how does it help me...
View attachment 8598
 

Attachments

  • 06-4.jpg
    06-4.jpg
    17.1 KB · Views: 88
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ketanco said:
what is the area of triangle ABC in the attached? answer is 18

i can not construct any similar triangles here. all i can see is area of ACD is 3 times area of ABD but how does it help me...

How about extending AC to E such that ACD is similar to ECB?

[TIKZ]
\def\x{sqrt(265)/4}
\def\gamma{atan2(3,16)}
\coordinate[label=above:A] (A) at ({4*\x - 12 * cos(\gamma)},{12 * sin(\gamma)});
\coordinate[label=left:B] (B) at (0,0);
\coordinate[label=right:C] (C) at ({4*\x},0);
\coordinate[label=below:D] (D) at ({\x},0);
\coordinate[label=above:E] (E) at ({4*\x - 16 * cos(\gamma)},{16 * sin(\gamma)});

\draw[rotate={270-\gamma}] (A) +(0.4,0) -- +(0.4,0.4) -- +(0,0.4);
\draw[rotate={270-\gamma}] (E) +(0.4,0) -- +(0.4,0.4) -- +(0,0.4);

\draw (C) -- node[above] {12} (A) -- node[above left] {5} (B);
\draw (A) -- (D);
\draw (A) -- (E) -- (B);
\path (B) -- node[below] {$x$} (D) -- node[below] {$3x$} (C);
\draw[blue, ultra thick] (A) -- (B) -- (C) -- cycle;
[/TIKZ]
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
How about extending AC to E such that ACD is similar to ECB?

[TIKZ]
\def\x{sqrt(265)/4}
\def\gamma{atan2(3,16)}
\coordinate[label=above:A] (A) at ({4*\x - 12 * cos(\gamma)},{12 * sin(\gamma)});
\coordinate[label=left:B] (B) at (0,0);
\coordinate[label=right:C] (C) at ({4*\x},0);
\coordinate[label=below:D] (D) at ({\x},0);
\coordinate[label=above:E] (E) at ({4*\x - 16 * cos(\gamma)},{16 * sin(\gamma)});

\draw[rotate={270-\gamma}] (A) +(0.4,0) -- +(0.4,0.4) -- +(0,0.4);
\draw[rotate={270-\gamma}] (E) +(0.4,0) -- +(0.4,0.4) -- +(0,0.4);

\draw (C) -- node[above] {12} (A) -- node[above left] {5} (B);
\draw (A) -- (D);
\draw (A) -- (E) -- (B);
\path (B) -- node[below] {$x$} (D) -- node[below] {$3x$} (C);
\draw[blue, ultra thick] (A) -- (B) -- (C) -- cycle;
[/TIKZ]
i see... thanks !
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top