MHB As for the question,How can I simplify (8x^1/2)/(x^2/3)]^1/3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex6977
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Issues
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying the expression [(8x^1/2)/(x^2/3)]^1/3. The correct simplification leads to the result 2/x^1/18, while the initial misunderstanding resulted in 8/x^1/18. Participants clarify that applying the exponent to both the numerator and denominator is crucial for accuracy. The importance of converting rational exponents to a common denominator for subtraction is emphasized. Ultimately, the correct application of the exponent resolves the confusion, leading to the accurate simplification.
Alex6977
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi i have a question i know the answer to but don't understand how it was reached.

[(8x^1/2)/(x^2/3)]^1/3

it comes to 2/x^1/18
but how? I got 8/x^1/18

thx
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Simplificaiton issues

Hello and welcome! :D

$$\left(\frac{8x^{1/2}}{x^{2/3}}\right)^{1/3}=\left(\frac{8}{x^{1/6}}\right)^{1/3}=\frac{8^{1/3}}{\left(x^{1/6}\right)^{1/3}}=\frac{2}{x^{1/18}}$$
 
Re: Simplificaiton issues

I see i tried applying the outside ^1/3 first to eliminate that right off the bat. which would be

8x^1/6 over X^2/9.

but that's still corrrect so far right?

then that equals.

8x^3/18 over x^4/18. but then it starts to look bad and i get lost. maybe you just can't do it that way?

- - - Updated - - -

Oh and thanks
 
Your first step is valid, you just need to remember to apply it to the 8 as well, so that you have:

$$\left(\frac{8x^{1/2}}{x^{2/3}}\right)^{1/3}=\frac{2x^{1/6}}{x^{2/9}}$$

Your next step is good too, to convert the rational exponents to a common denominator so they can be subtracted:

$$\left(\frac{8x^{1/2}}{x^{2/3}}\right)^{1/3}=\frac{2x^{3/18}}{x^{4/18}}=\frac{2}{x^{1/18}}$$
 
I can't follow that. sorry

- - - Updated - - -

nevermind its displaying right now

- - - Updated - - -

AHHHHH i didn't apply it to the 8. THere we go. Thanks a ton
 
Alex6977 said:
I can't follow that. sorry

- - - Updated - - -

nevermind its displaying right now

- - - Updated - - -

AHHHHH i didn't apply it to the 8. THere we go. Thanks a ton

Yeah, I had some missing brackets in my $\LaTeX$ code, and I didn't preview, so you saw a real mess before I got it fixed. :D
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top