Blue or green solar thermal collector?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chiel555
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the efficiency of solar thermal collectors with black adsorbers compared to potential blue or green alternatives. Black adsorbers are effective because they absorb a wide range of the electromagnetic spectrum, including infrared radiation, which is crucial for heat transfer. While colored adsorbers might reflect visible light, they could potentially absorb non-visible wavelengths better, but overall efficiency is likely to be lower than that of black adsorbers. The conversation also highlights the importance of using the correct terminology, emphasizing "absorption" over "adsorption" in the context of heat transfer. Ultimately, the key factor in solar collector performance is not just absorption rates, but also how well they manage low-temperature radiation.
Chiel555
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello, i have a question;
The most solar thermal collectors i have seen have a black adsorber; this adsorbs the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum; that's why they are black right?
is het possible to have an adsorber painted green or blue which still adsorbs a reasonable amount of the electromagnetic spectrum ( i mean the full electromagnetic spectrum: visible and non visible )? ;
it will reflect the green or blue light( because that's the reason it looks green or blue) so it will adsorb less of the visible part electromagnetic spectrum than a black adsorber;
but maybe it will adsorb some lightwaves from the non visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum better than a black adsorber; so that in total it might adsorb more or less the same light energy as a black adsorber
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Is there a reason you want this solar collector to be blue or green versus black? Almost certainly it will not be as efficient.

Also, are you using the term "adsorption" on purpose? It seems like you should be using "absorption" for the heat transfer: https://chembam.com/definitions/adsorption-vs-absorption/
 
Chiel555 said:
this adsorbs the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum; that's why they are black right?
Nobody said that it'll absorb only the visible spectrum.
Actually, usually it's absorbing quite an amount of IR (thermal) radiation too.
(And UV too, but that's not much - not much coming through the atmosphere anyway.)

Chiel555 said:
but maybe it will adsorb some lightwaves from the non visible part
Google up 'selective solar coating'.

Ps.: the key point is actually not the absorption - it's usually above 90%. It's the low temperature radiation, what makes the difference for these solar paints...
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Where is my curb stop?'
My water meter is submerged under water for about 95% of the year. Today I took a photograph of the inside of my water meter box because today is one of the rare days that my water meter is not submerged in water. Here is the photograph that I took of my water meter with the cover on: Here is a photograph I took of my water meter with the cover off: I edited the photograph to draw a red circle around a knob on my water meter. Is that knob that I drew a red circle around my meter...
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top