Can a cyclotron be used for nuclear fusion

In summary: Compact cyclotrons (about 250 MeV) are being used to do proton beam cancer treatment. The facilities are much more complex than electron beam accelerators, and do provide a better beam for some (all?) cancers.
  • #1
RADboy
13
0
essentailly cyclotrons are used to smash one atom into another. can it be done to fuse atoms?

oh and i read that cyclotrons are used to treat canncer. they shoot ionizing particles at the cancer while, avoiding non cancer tissue. if anyone knows the best way to cure cancer in terms of radiation please let me know.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, cyclotrons are a type of particle accelerator and fusing atoms is mostly an act of banging them together hard enough that they overcome the potential barrier, so it can be done. Although, this would not be a very efficient method alone to generate sustained power as a nuclear fusion reactor, if that's what you had in mind. The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak" is much more promising as a nuclear fusion reactor, and it is related in principle to a cyclotron in that they both used magnetic confinement.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
To answer your question about the best way to treat cancer, it depends on the type of cancer, where it's located, how advanced it is, etc. For exampl,e most thyroid cancers are easily treatable with I-131 to ablate the thyroid. Certain gliomas use I-131 bound to scorpion venom, others use a gamma knife, others use linacs, etc.
 
  • #4
whoa please define a gamma knife!
 
  • #5
I have seen a 300 kilovolt electrostatic accelerator (Cockroft-Walton) used for D-T fusion neutron generation. Using a cyclotron would be overkill for D-T fusion. "Gamma knife" I think is a trade-mark name for a Varian brand electron accelerator (linac), about 6 MeV, used for cancer treatment with high energy collimated x-rays (actually bremsstrahlung).

Compact cyclotrons (about 250 MeV) are being used to do proton beam cancer treatment. The facilities are much more complex than electron beam accelerators, and do provide a better beam for some (all?) cancers.

Bob S
 
  • #6
@BobS
yes i rad that the gamma knife is used for brain surgery. using colbalt-60 as the radioactive element. they surgically attach the operating table onto the patients head. the laser is attached to the operating tabel and as the gamma knife's name implys it's as accurate as a blade
 
  • #7
RADboy said:
@BobS
yes i rad that the gamma knife is used for brain surgery. using colbalt-60 as the radioactive element. they surgically attach the operating table onto the patients head. the laser is attached to the operating tabel and as the gamma knife's name implys it's as accurate as a blade
GE has developed such a system. The trick is to use several separate and collimated gamma sources, such anyone is a reduced dose, but the beams are directed at a common point or focus, so that the target receives a much higher dose than the surrounding tissue.

The cobalt sources are irradiated in a commerical reactor in a special assembly.
 
  • #8
Astronuc said:
GE has developed such a system. The trick is to use several separate and collimated gamma sources, such anyone is a reduced dose, but the beams are directed at a common point or focus, so that the target receives a much higher dose than the surrounding tissue.
The electron linac radiation sources are very small and typically rotate through a complete 360 degree arc around the patient during a single IMRT (intensity modulated radiation treatment) radiation treatment. The intensity modulation includes active control of the beam collimation aperture (tungsten shims). Each treatment lasts less than 5 minutes.

For proton beams, the roughly 240-MeV proton beam requires an accelerator (cyclotron, synchrotron) which is much too large to move around the patient, so a very large gantry of bending and focusing magnets rotates around the patient during treatment. (It would be easier to spin the patient, but internal organs tend to move around during the treatment).

Bob S
 
  • #9
yes i remember. what's special about the assembly. i know cobalt-60's half-life is around 5 years. does that have anything to do with it?
 
  • #10
chrisbaird said:
Yes, cyclotrons are a type of particle accelerator and fusing atoms is mostly an act of banging them together hard enough that they overcome the potential barrier, so it can be done. Although, this would not be a very efficient method alone to generate sustained power as a nuclear fusion reactor, if that's what you had in mind. The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak" is much more promising as a nuclear fusion reactor, and it is related in principle to a cyclotron in that they both used magnetic confinement.
By the method of generation of circular electric field TOKAMAK is very similar to betatron.
As in both those devices plasma torus in one case and the circulating beam in the second are considered as secondary winding of transformer.
Betatrons have space charge current limitation as their purpose is to generation of beams of charged particles charged uniformly - or in the other words beams in betatrons are non-neutralized.
Currents in TOKAMAKs where quasineutral plasma is used reach to megaamperes orders and limited with instabilities creation conditions e.g. Kruskal-Shafranov limitation.
There are some projects to build high currents betatrons: FFAG betatrons, betatron with additional Stellarator windings (Stellatron) http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1108024/files/p79.pdf , etc.

I proposed to inject into the common equilibrium betatron orbit two types of reacting ions moving with different velocities at one direction and relativistic electrons oppositely.
That should work as we can avoid betatron's space charge current limitation, unidirectional currents attract each other making pinch and different velocities can provide enough collision energy in center-of-mass frame.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related to Can a cyclotron be used for nuclear fusion

1. Can a cyclotron accelerate particles to the high energies needed for nuclear fusion?

Yes, a cyclotron can accelerate particles to the energies required for nuclear fusion. Cyclotrons use a high-frequency alternating electric field to accelerate charged particles in a circular path, allowing them to reach very high velocities.

2. Is a cyclotron capable of producing nuclear fusion reactions?

Yes, a cyclotron can be used to produce nuclear fusion reactions. The accelerated particles can be directed to collide with a target containing a fusion fuel, such as deuterium and tritium, resulting in fusion reactions.

3. How efficient is a cyclotron for nuclear fusion compared to other methods?

Cyclotrons are not as efficient for nuclear fusion as some other methods, such as magnetic confinement fusion or laser fusion. This is because the particles in a cyclotron are accelerated in a circular path, which limits the amount of time they spend in the reaction area. However, cyclotrons can still be used for small-scale nuclear fusion experiments.

4. Can a cyclotron be used for commercial nuclear fusion power generation?

No, a cyclotron is not a practical method for commercial nuclear fusion power generation. The size and cost of a cyclotron would make it impractical for producing large amounts of fusion energy. Other methods, such as magnetic confinement fusion, are being studied for potential use in commercial power generation.

5. What are the main challenges in using a cyclotron for nuclear fusion?

The main challenges in using a cyclotron for nuclear fusion include the limited time that particles spend in the reaction area, as well as the high cost and size of the equipment. Additionally, the energy efficiency of a cyclotron for fusion is lower compared to other methods. These challenges make it more suitable for small-scale experiments rather than large-scale power generation.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
12K
Replies
5
Views
927
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top