Can Adding Alternators to Car Wheels Save Energy?

In summary: DaveThere are ALWAYS losses in a system ... and in any mechanical system, friction accounts for most of itso power recovered can never...ever...be more than the power used to generate it in the first place ... and you're just going to use more fuel to overcome that loading
  • #1
mrblanco
5
0
I have a friend that wants to put several alternators on a car. However, he wants to gather the power from the wheels rather than the engine in order to "capture lost energy" and "save" fuel by running the AC and other electrical components off these alternators. I've already explained that this is not possible because the engine is driving the wheels, therefore, the source of energy is still the fuel in the car. Furthermore, getting the power from the wheels is less efficient than getting it from the engine as there are energy loses through the transmission and the driveline. Also, the new alternator(s) would decrease efficiency because it, itself is not 100% efficient and it would add to drag forces. He's really stuck on this idea, so I need to show him how it's wrong with the math. I am a bit stuck on this part. I know I need to do energy balance by using the first law of thermodynamics but that's as far as I'm getting.

I looked up the loses due to transmission and driveline and those are estimated to be around 5.6%. I also looked at several alternator efficiency curves and their efficiency is usually between 40% with peak efficiency going as high as 60%. I also looked up AC power draw and found it to be around 720 watts.

I haven't done a thermo or physics course in a long time so any help to get the ball rolling here would be much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
hi there
welcome to PF
You gave your thread a really bad title, I almost reported it. PPM discussion isn't allowed on PF, not even to debunk it

Maybe the moderators can rename the thread to something more appropriate ? @berkeman

mrblanco said:
I have a friend that wants to put several alternators on a car. However, he wants to gather the power from the wheels rather than the engine in order to "capture lost energy" and "save" fuel by running the AC and other electrical components off these alternators.

power can be gathered during braking or down hill coasting ... google regenerative braking as used by electric cars.
recovered power is low but is used to do some recharging of the battery ... never enough to fully recharge it tho
You can never generate enough power tho and most of the power is still being supplied by the fuel

There is no point trying to recover power during normal flat ground/up hill driving, as the energy lost to the drag caused by the load of the alternator will always be more than the power generated. And you are just going to use more fuel to overcome that loadingDave
 
Last edited:
  • #3
davenn said:
hi there
welcome to PF
You gave your thread a really bad title, I almost reported it. PPM discussion isn't allowed on PF, not even to debunk it
power can be gathered during braking or down hill coasting ... google regenerative braking as used by electric cars.
recovered power is low but is used to do some recharging of the battery ... never enough to fully recharge it tho
You can never generate enough power tho and most of the power is still being supplied by the fuel

There is no point trying to recover power during normal flat ground/up hill driving, as the energy lost to the drag caused by the load of the alternator will always be more than the power generated. And you are just going to use more fuel to overcome that loadingDave

I had no idea this was a rule (Assuming PPM is perpetual motion) I can't really change the title now though, or can I?

As for your answer, I completely get that and know the only way to get some "free" energy is while going downhill or braking. However, this guy is pretty hard headed and "needs to know for sure." I think if I can just show him the math and why it would never work, I might get through
 
  • #4
davenn said:
welcome to PF
You gave your thread a really bad title, I almost reported it. PPM discussion isn't allowed on PF, not even to debunk it
Thread title changed to "Capture a car's lost energy"
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #5
mrblanco said:
I had no idea this was a rule (Assuming PPM is perpetual motion) I can't really change the title now though, or can I?

you should have read the rules when you signed up :wink:
As you can see I tagged a mentor to hopefully change it ( no you cannot)
 
  • #6
Mark44 said:
Thread title changed to "Capture a car's lost energy"

Thanks @Mark44
 
  • #8
mrblanco said:
However, this guy is pretty hard headed and "needs to know for sure." I think if I can just show him the math and why it would never work, I might get through

there are ALWAYS losses in a system ... and in any mechanical system, friction accounts for most of it

so power recovered can never come close to power generated
 
  • #9
Diesel-electric locomotives generate electricity when they're going downhill, but this is to assist in braking, not to make up for the fuel used by the engine(s).
 
  • #10
Hard-headed? My cousin who thinks he can run a water pump from an inverter attached to a battery to run a water wheel to power an alternator/generator which then charges the battery back and he thinks he can create energy. Explained 1st and 2nd thermodynamic laws, friction loss etc. and he refuses to believe. Tried to joke with him saying I was running a battery charger charging a battery that was running an inverter powered by the battery charging -- in other words, the same type of circle just without the extras. He didn't get it.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
It's unfortunately a common problem. But since it looks like the OP had it right all along and the discussion isn't really acceptable here, I think it can be locked.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and berkeman

1. How does capturing a car's lost energy work?

Capturing a car's lost energy involves using technology such as regenerative braking or exhaust gas recirculation to convert the car's kinetic energy into electrical energy, which can be stored and used to power the vehicle's electronics or assist with acceleration.

2. What are the benefits of capturing a car's lost energy?

The main benefit is increased fuel efficiency, as the captured energy can reduce the load on the car's engine and decrease the amount of fuel needed to power the vehicle. It can also reduce emissions and help extend the lifespan of the car's brakes.

3. How much energy can be captured from a car's lost energy?

The amount of energy that can be captured varies depending on the technology used and the driving conditions. On average, regenerative braking can capture 15-20% of a car's kinetic energy, while exhaust gas recirculation can capture up to 10% of the energy from the engine's exhaust gases.

4. Is capturing a car's lost energy expensive?

The cost of implementing energy capture technology in a car can vary, but it is generally considered to be a cost-effective way to improve fuel efficiency. The initial investment may be higher, but the long-term savings on fuel costs can offset this cost.

5. Can any car be retrofitted to capture lost energy?

Yes, there are retrofit kits available for certain types of cars that can add regenerative braking or other energy capture technology. However, not all cars are suitable for retrofitting, so it's important to research and consult with a mechanic before attempting to add energy capture technology to a car.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
638
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
3
Replies
95
Views
4K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
4
Replies
117
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top