Characterization of External Direct Sum - Cooperstein, pages 359 - 360

In summary, Cooperstein explains in Section 10.2 that properties (a) and (b) characterize a space V as the direct sum of subspaces V_1, ..., V_n. This is shown through the use of linear maps, specifically pi_1, pi_2, epsilon_1, and epsilon_2, and the conditions that pi_1 o epsilon_1 = 1_V_1, pi_2 o epsilon_2 = 1_V_2, and epsilon_1 o pi_1 + epsilon_2 o pi_2 = 1_V. An isomorphism, phi, is also defined and shown to be linear, injective, and surjective, which ultimately proves that V is
  • #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
3,990
48
I am reading Bruce N. Coopersteins book: Advanced Linear Algebra (Second Edition) ... ...

In Section 10.2 Cooperstein writes the following, essentially about external direct sums ... ...
View attachment 5518
View attachment 5519
Cooperstein asserts that properties (a) and (b) above "characterize the space \(\displaystyle V\) as the direct sum of the spaces \(\displaystyle V_1, \ ... \ ... \ , V_n\)."

Can someone please explain how/why properties (a) and (b) above characterize the space \(\displaystyle V\) as the direct sum of the spaces \(\displaystyle V_1, \ ... \ ... \ , V_n\)?Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Let's investigate just two factors (extending this to arbitrarily finitely many isn't hard, but it takes more dots and more "index hell").

We want to show that given $V$, and two other vectors spaces $V_1,V_2$ along with four LINEAR maps:

$\pi_1:V \to V_1$
$\pi_2:V \to V_2$
$\epsilon_1:V_1 \to V$
$\epsilon_2:V_2 \to V$

such that:

$\pi_1\circ\epsilon_1 = 1_{V_1}$
$\pi_2\circ\epsilon_2 = 1_{V_2}$

and:

$\epsilon_1\circ \pi_1 + \epsilon_2\circ\pi_2 = 1_V$

that $V \cong V_1 \oplus V_2$.

So, one way we can do this is to exhibit an isomorphism:

$\phi: V \to V_1 \oplus V_2$ (Note I haven't said anything about whether or not the $V_i$ are even subspaces of $V$).

So here is how we will define $\phi$:

$\phi(v) = (\pi_1(v),\pi_2(v))$. Note this has the proper co-domain.

First, we'll show that $\phi$ is linear:

$\phi(v+v') = (\pi_1(v+v'),\pi_2(v+v')) = (\pi_1(v) + \pi_1(v'),\pi_2(v) + \pi_2(v'))$

$= (\pi_1(v),\pi_2(v)) + (\pi_1(v'),\pi_2(v')) = \phi(v) + \phi(v')$.

$\phi(av) = (\pi_1(av),\pi_2(av)) = (a\pi_1(v),a\pi_2(v)) = a(\pi_1(v),\pi_2(v)) = a\phi(v)$.

Now suppose that $\phi(v) = (0,0)$. We want to show $v = 0$.

Now $\phi(v) = (\pi_1(v),\pi_2(v))$, so if $\phi(v) = (0,0)$, we have (for this $v$):

$\pi_1(v) = 0$
$\pi_2(v) = 0$.

Since the $\epsilon_i$ are linear, we have: $\epsilon_1(0) = 0$, and $\epsilon_2(0) = 0$.

Thus $v = 1_V(v) = (\epsilon_1\circ \pi_1 + \epsilon_2\circ\pi_2)(v) = (\epsilon_1\circ \pi_1)(v) + (\epsilon_2\circ\pi_2)(v)$

$= \epsilon_1(\pi_1(v)) + \epsilon_2(\pi_2(v)) = \epsilon_1(0) + \epsilon_2(0) = 0 + 0 = 0$.

Thus $\phi$ is injective.

Before we tackle surjectivity, we prove a preliminary result:

$\pi_1 \circ \epsilon_2 = 0$
$\pi_2 \circ \epsilon_1 = 0$.

To prove this, we note that the $\pi_i$ are surjective, I will show this for $\pi_1$ (the proof is just the same for $\pi_2$):

Let $v_1 \in V_1$. Then we have $\pi_1(\epsilon_1(v_1)) = v_1$, so $v_1$ has the pre-image under $\pi_1$ of $\epsilon_1(v_1) \in V$.

Now for any $v \in V$, we have:

$v = \epsilon_1(\pi_1(v)) + \epsilon_2(\pi_2(v))$, so taking $\pi_2$ of both sides, we have:

$\pi_2(v) = \pi_2(\epsilon_1(\pi_1(v)) + \epsilon_2(\pi_2(v))) = \pi_2(\epsilon_1(\pi_1(v))) + \pi_2(\epsilon_2(\pi_2(v)))$

$= \pi_2(\epsilon_1(\pi_1(v))) + \pi_2(v)$.

Subtracting $\pi_2(v)$ from both sides, we have:

$0 = \pi_2(\epsilon_1(\pi_1(v)))$.

Now since $\pi_1$ is surjective, we can write ANY $v_1 \in V_1$ as $\pi_1(v)$ for SOME $v \in V$, so the above shows that (for such a $v$ so that $v_1 = \pi(v)$):

$0 = \pi_2(\epsilon_1(v_1))$, and thus this holds for any $v_1 \in V_1$.

The other condition is proved similarly.

Finally, let $(v_1,v_2)$ be any element of $V_1 \oplus V_2$.

Consider $\epsilon_1(v_1) + \epsilon_2(v_2) \in V$.

We have $\phi(\epsilon_1(v_1) + \epsilon_2(v_2)) = \phi(\epsilon_1(v_1)) + \phi(\epsilon_2(v_2))$

$= (\pi_1(\epsilon_1(v_1)),\pi_2(\epsilon_1(v_1))) + (\pi_1(\epsilon_2(v_2)),\pi_2(\epsilon_2(v_2)))$

$= (v_1,0) + (0,v_2) = (v_1,v_2)$, and $\phi$ is surjective.
 

1. What is the purpose of characterizing external direct sums?

The purpose of characterizing external direct sums is to understand the structure and properties of a direct sum of two or more vector spaces. This characterization allows for easier manipulation and analysis of these vector spaces.

2. What is an external direct sum?

An external direct sum is a vector space that is formed by combining two or more vector spaces in a specific way. This combination is done externally, meaning that the vector spaces are not merged or overlapped, but rather kept separate and their elements are combined in a specific way.

3. How is an external direct sum different from an internal direct sum?

An external direct sum is different from an internal direct sum in the way that the vector spaces are combined. In an internal direct sum, the vector spaces are merged or overlapped to form a new vector space, whereas in an external direct sum, the vector spaces remain separate, and their elements are combined in a specific way to form a new vector space.

4. What are the properties of an external direct sum?

The properties of an external direct sum include the commutativity and associativity of addition, the existence of an identity element, and the existence of inverse elements. These properties allow for easier manipulation and analysis of the direct sum.

5. How is the external direct sum characterized?

The external direct sum is characterized by the direct sum operation, which is defined as a specific mapping of the Cartesian product of two or more vector spaces onto the external direct sum. This mapping follows certain rules and properties, including the preservation of addition, scalar multiplication, and the properties of an external direct sum.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top