Chernobyl NPP visit radiation question

In summary, the conversation discusses the safety and necessity of going inside the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant for a hands-on dosimetry learning experience and adventure. It is noted that the plant is in a slow decommissioning process and respirators should be worn inside due to potential dust from dismantling. The effects of long-lived isotopes and neutron radiation are also mentioned. The conversation concludes with the suggestion to ask for guidance from contacts at the plant and reassurance that necessary precautions will be provided.
  • #1
girts
186
22
Hi, this has been probably asked a few times here but let me do it again,Since I'm planning to go to Chernobyl NPP for a "hands on" dosimetry learning experience and also for some adventure, I was wondering how safe or should I rather say necessary it would be to go inside the plant itself? Ofcourse I don't mean the sealed off 4th reactor but into the remaining plant and in any of the other reactors that were shut down in a preplanned way.

As far as I talked with one retired engineer , with him we came to the conclusion that one should only be careful to avoid any dust that might contain alpha emitters from inhaling otherwise for a short while say a day or two the gamma background wouldn't do any harm even at the levels present both in the zone and the plant itself.
So because the plant is in a slow decommissioning process I guess we would be wise to wear respirators inside as the dismantling of stuff probably creates some dust that might not be good to breathe in correct?
As for the zone I assume respirators are not needed anymore in general because over the past 31 years rain and natural processes have probably buried most of the contaminated dust from the reactor inside the soil ?
Since Chernobyl (both the destroyed reactors and also the working ones) have ended active energy production for quite some years now I assume that most of the powerful short lived isotopes have already decayed to a negligible level and apart from inhaling dust the radioactivity coming from outside is mostly long lived isotope emitted gamma radiation , like that from CS137 (even though first half life is already over )
What about neutron radiation from decay, I sure don't know all the radioactive isotopes that still emit neutron radiation after a given amount of time but in general?

Oh just by the way, I realize that this question is very hard to answer due to the many variables involved but is there an approximate level of absorbed dose per given amount of time which a human can feel in terms of being tired or feeling a little weak or any other effects (excluding the placebo scare or other self induced feelings) , or do these effects only happen when life threatening levels of ionizing radiation are absorbed like in the case of the first responders of the 1986 accident?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
girts said:
Since I'm planning to go to Chernobyl NPP for a "hands on" dosimetry learning experience and also for some adventure,
It is not clear that it'll be some private touristic adventure, or is it official plant visit?
As I know the area of the former NPPs is still in daily use, so if it is not official, then forget about visiting.
If it is official then you can ask for guidance from your contacts there: they should be able to give you adequate answer according to the planned tour.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #3
Ofcourse it is official how else? Yes sure there are about 1500 something people working there on the deccomissioning etc daily, Yes I am doing the talks with the representatives etc, but i wanted a bit of scientific insight beyond what i already know , make no mistake the folks on site are not dumb but their also not particle or nuclear physicists atleast not most of them so before i meet one there i wanted to prepare
 
  • #4
No real need to prepare. Such workplaces are usually divided to zones with rules specific to the zones. Everything necessary will be provided, according to the overprotective safety rules relevant to your visit plan.
On top of that, the usually accessed places are already well cleaned up.

You will get higher dose during your flight there than during your actual visit. Just keep the rules and ask if something is not clear.
 

1. What is the current radiation level at Chernobyl NPP?

The current radiation level at Chernobyl NPP varies depending on the location within the site. However, the average radiation level is around 0.3-0.4 microsieverts per hour, which is considered safe for short-term visits.

2. Is it safe to visit Chernobyl NPP?

Yes, it is generally safe to visit Chernobyl NPP as long as you follow the safety guidelines and regulations set by the authorities. These include wearing protective gear, staying within designated areas, and limiting your visit to a certain amount of time.

3. Are there any long-term health risks associated with visiting Chernobyl NPP?

Long-term health risks from visiting Chernobyl NPP are minimal as long as you follow the safety precautions and do not stay for extended periods of time. However, it is important to note that the risk of developing cancer from radiation exposure is slightly higher for those who were exposed to higher levels of radiation, such as the workers and firefighters at the time of the accident.

4. Can I bring my children to visit Chernobyl NPP?

Children are allowed to visit Chernobyl NPP, but it is recommended to limit their exposure to radiation by following the safety guidelines and regulations. It is also important to note that children are more sensitive to radiation, so it is best to consult with a doctor before bringing them to the site.

5. How long can I stay at Chernobyl NPP during a visit?

The recommended length of stay at Chernobyl NPP is no longer than a few hours. This minimizes the risk of radiation exposure and allows for enough time to explore the site and learn about its history. Extended stays may require special permits and additional safety measures.

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
774
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
55
Views
338K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
3
Replies
83
Views
13K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
17
Views
7K
Back
Top