- #1
Leo Liu
- 353
- 156
- TL;DR Summary
- .
Could someone explain why ##[a][x_0]=[c]\iff ax_0\equiv c\, (mod\, m)##?
My instructor said it came from the definition of congruence class. But I am not convinced.
Wonderful. I didn't know this form of definition but after seeing its justification (transitivity and symmetry) I am convinced.ergospherical said:Recall that ##[x] = [y]## if ##x \equiv y \ (\mathrm{mod \ m})##. Then it's just a case of using ##[a][x_0] = [ax_0]##.
The Congruence Class Proof of modular arithmetic theorem is a mathematical proof that states that if two integers have the same remainder when divided by a positive integer, then they are considered congruent modulo that integer.
The Congruence Class Proof of modular arithmetic theorem is important because it allows us to solve problems involving remainders and modular arithmetic in a systematic and efficient way. It also has applications in computer science, cryptography, and other fields.
The Congruence Class Proof of modular arithmetic theorem is used in real life in a variety of ways. For example, it is used in computer programming to optimize algorithms and in cryptography to ensure secure communication. It is also used in fields such as engineering, finance, and physics to solve problems involving remainders and modular arithmetic.
Some examples of problems that can be solved using the Congruence Class Proof of modular arithmetic theorem include finding the last digit of a large number, determining the day of the week for a given date, and solving linear congruences.
Yes, there are some limitations to the Congruence Class Proof of modular arithmetic theorem. It only applies to integers and cannot be used for non-integer numbers. Additionally, it is only applicable to remainders when divided by a positive integer, not negative integers. It also does not work for all types of modular arithmetic, such as non-linear congruences.