Conservation of momentum and energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the conservation of momentum and energy as Gayle and her brother descend a hill on a sled. The initial calculations for the sled's speed after Gayle's descent and the subsequent addition of her brother's mass were questioned. A key point raised is the need to calculate the sled's speed at a specific height before incorporating the brother's mass, emphasizing the importance of using conservation of momentum correctly. The correct approach involves determining the sled's velocity before the brother hops on and then recalculating the total energy after he joins. This method ensures accurate results for the final speed at the bottom of the hill.
Zubz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, new to the forums and I was wondering if someone could help me figure out what I am doing wrong. Thanx in advance.
Gayle runs at a speed of 4.38 m/s and dives on a sled, which is initially at rest on the top of a frictionless snow-covered hill. After she has descended a vertical distance of 5.33 m, her brother, who is initially at rest, hops on her back and together they continue down the hill. What is their speed at the bottom of the hill if the total vertical drop is 12.6 m? Gayle's mass is 46.5 kg, the sled has a mass of 6.00 kg and her brother has a mass of 32.4 kg.

Homework Equations



K.E=1/2mv^2
P.E.=mgy
p=mv
Mgyle= 46.5 kg
M(gyle+sled)= 52.5 kg
M(gyle+sled+bro) = 84.9 KG

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so what i did was i found out the initial speed of the sled using conservation of momentum.
p=p!(prime)
Mgyle*Ugyle = M(gyle+sled)V
V=3.89 m/s
then i used conservation of energy to find out the velocity of the sled at 5.35m.
Ebefore= Eafter
mgYo + 1/2mV1^2 = mgY1 + 1/2mV2^2
( 2(52.5)(9.81)(12.6) + (52.5*3.89^2) - (2*52.5*9.81*5.35) ) / 52.5 = v2^2
v2= 12.55 m/s
Now when i calculated this velocity. Should i include the brothers mass or do i find it after using conservation of momentum using the new velocity (12.55 m/s).
AND if i use conservation of momentum i get the new velocity to be 7.76 m/s (when brothers jumps on) at 5.35m.
After that, I use conservation of energy again to find final velocity.
Ebefore = Eafter
2MgY1 + MV2^2 = MV3^2
( (2*84.9*9.81*5.35) + (84.9*7.76^2) ) / 84.9 = v3^2 (USED NEW VELOCITY AFTER COLLISION WITH BROTHER)
v3 = 12.85 m/s but this isn't right. Can any1 tell me where i went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
then i used conservation of energy to find out the velocity of the sled at 5.35m.
Ebefore= Eafter
mgYo + 1/2mV1^2 = mgY1 + 1/2mV2^2
( 2(52.5)(9.81)(12.6) + (52.5*3.89^2) - (2*52.5*9.81*5.35) ) / 52.5 = v2^2

After she has descended a vertical distance of 5.33 m,

I believe I have found your problem. When the sled descends a vertical distance of 5.33 m, the sled is a vertical distance of (12.6 - 5.33) m above the ground. You should come up with about 10.94 m/sec for the speed at that point before the brother hops on.

Now when i calculated this velocity. Should i include the brothers mass or do i find it after using conservation of momentum using the new velocity (12.55 m/s).
Find the velocity of the sled without the brother's mass at (12.6 - 5.33) m above the ground. Then use conservation of momentum with the new velocity to get the velocity after the brother gets on. Then use the result to calculate the total energy. The reasoning being that the sled is already traveling at a certain velocity before the brother gets on. When the brother jumps on, he not only changes the configuration of the potential and kinetic energy, but he adds to the total energy too. In order to figure out the new total energy, you need to find both the new potential energy that he adds and the new kinetic energy of the sled after he jumps on, but in order to calculate the new kinetic energy, you need to use the conservation of momentum.
 
Last edited:
thank you, worked perfectly.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top