Construction of a cyclic sequence re the Golden Ratio

In summary: Even bettergiven 0 \leq i \leq F_{2n} where F_{2n} is an even term in the Fibonacci sequence, then the fractional parts of i*tau denoted as {i*tau} when put in ascending order have each term put into the position i*F_{2n-1} \mod F_{2n}Thus for n = 3, F(2n) = 8 F(2n-1) = 5 Then mod 80*5 mod 8 = 0 {0*tau} = .000... 0*5-0*3 =05*5 mod 8 = 1 {5*t
  • #1
ramsey2879
841
3
The fractal sequence http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A054065
is of interest because it provides permutations of the numbers 1-n such
that the decimal part of k*tau (k = {1,2,3,...n} is ordered from the
lowest possible value to the highest. For instance if n = 3 the
permutation is 2,1,3 since .2360 < .6180 <.8541. (3*(1 + sqrt5)/2 =
4.8541..). However, other than calculating the decimal parts for each
k*tau and sorting the list no algorithm is provided for obtaining the
proper permutation of the numbers 1-n.
I have the algorithm to share with you.
Let F(odd) be the highest fibonacci number less or equal to n and F(2b)
be the highest even fibonacci number less than n.
start with k = F(odd) since of the numbers 1-n, k=F(odd) provides the
lowest possible decimal part for k*tau. Now follow the two rules below
in the order listed to get the subsequent terms in the permutation:
1. add F(odd) if the resulting value is less than F(odd+2)
2. subtract F(2b)
If the result of the first operation yields a number higher then you want in the permutation omit it. It would have been a part of the permutation
if n was chosen to be as larger such as F(odd+2)-1, however, so you can choose
to leave it in if you prefer to increase the number of terms in the
permutation instead. But even if you omit it continue the algorithm as
though it was included to get the next n in the permutation.
I said the permutation was cyclic because in fact you could start
with any number up to n and follow the above 2 rules to get all n
numbers in the permutation as though you were going around a clock only
you started at 6 instead of at 1.
I hope I didn't bore you with this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ramsey2879 said:
The fractal sequence http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A054065
is of interest because it provides permutations of the numbers 1-n such
that the decimal part of k*tau (k = {1,2,3,...n} is ordered from the
lowest possible value to the highest. For instance if n = 3 the
permutation is 2,1,3 since .2360 < .6180 <.8541. (3*(1 + sqrt5)/2 =
4.8541..). However, other than calculating the decimal parts for each
k*tau and sorting the list no algorithm is provided for obtaining the
proper permutation of the numbers 1-n.
I have the algorithm to share with you.
QUOTE]
Even better
given [tex]0 \leq i \leq F_{2n}[/tex] where [tex]F_{2n}[/tex] is an even term in the Fibonacci sequence, then the fractional parts of i*tau denoted as {i*tau} when put in ascending order have each term put into the position [tex] i*F_{2n-1} \mod F_{2n}[/tex]
Thus for n = 3, F(2n) = 8 F(2n-1) = 5 Then mod 8
0*5 mod 8 = 0 {0*tau} = .000...
5*5 mod 8 = 1 {5*tau} = .090...
2*5 mod 8 = 2 {2*tau} = .236...
7*5 mod 8 = 3 {7*tau} = .326...
4*5 mod 8 = 4 {4*tau} = .472...
1*5 mod 8 = 5 {1*tau} = .61803..
6*5 mod 8 = 6 {6*tau} = .708...
3*5 mod 8 = 7 {3*tau} = .854...
8*5 mod 8 = 8 {8*tau} = .944...

As n increases [tex] \{F_{2n}*tau \}[/tex] approaches .999... . For instance F(16) = 987
{987*tau} = .99954..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Even better
given [tex]0 \leq i \leq F_{2n}[/tex] where [tex]F_{2n}[/tex] is an even term in the Fibonacci sequence, then the fractional parts of i*tau denoted as {i*tau} when put in ascending order have each term put into the position [tex] i*F_{2n-1} \mod F_{2n}[/tex]
Thus for n = 3, F(2n) = 8 F(2n-1) = 5 Then mod 8
0*5 mod 8 = 0 {0*tau} = .000... 0*5-0*3 =0
5*5 mod 8 = 1 {5*tau} = .090... 5*5-3*8 = 1
2*5 mod 8 = 2 {2*tau} = .236... 2*5-1*8 = 2 ...6-5 = 1
7*5 mod 8 = 3 {7*tau} = .326... 7*5-4*8 = 3 ...9-5 = 4
4*5 mod 8 = 4 {4*tau} = .472... 4*5-2*8 = 4 ...12-10= 2
1*5 mod 8 = 5 {1*tau} = .61803..1*5-0*8=5 ...15 - 15 = 0
6*5 mod 8 = 6 {6*tau} = .708...6*5-3*8=6 ...18-15 = 3
3*5 mod 8 = 7 {3*tau} = .854...3*5-1*8=7 ...21-20 = 1
8*5 mod 8 = 8 {8*tau} = .944...8*5-4*8=8 ...24 -20= 4

Since it is known that F(2n-2)*F(2n+2) + 1 = F(n-1)^2 and tau is sightly greater than F(2n)/F(n-1) the above relation follows from multiplying this equation by i = 1,2,3,4... and reducing mod 8 and mod 5 respectively

As n increases [tex] \{F_{2n}*tau \}[/tex] approaches .999... . For instance F(16) = 987
{987*tau} = .99954..
 

1. What is the Golden Ratio and why is it important in construction?

The Golden Ratio, also known as the divine proportion, is a mathematical ratio of approximately 1.618. It has been used in art and architecture for centuries as it is believed to create aesthetically pleasing and harmonious proportions. In construction, the Golden Ratio can be used to determine the ideal dimensions and proportions of a building or structure.

2. How is the Golden Ratio used to create a cyclic sequence?

The Golden Ratio can be used to create a cyclic sequence by multiplying a number by 1.618 and then adding it to the original number. This process can then be repeated with the new number, creating a sequence that continues infinitely. For example, starting with the number 1, the sequence would be: 1, 1.618, 2.618, 4.236, 6.854, and so on.

3. Can the Golden Ratio be used in all types of construction?

Yes, the Golden Ratio can be used in various types of construction, including architecture, engineering, and design. It can be used to determine the proportions of a building, the placement of elements within a structure, and even the design of furniture and objects.

4. Are there any other ratios or principles used in construction besides the Golden Ratio?

Yes, there are many other ratios and principles used in construction, such as the Fibonacci sequence, the Pythagorean theorem, and the rule of thirds. These ratios and principles can be used in conjunction with the Golden Ratio to create balanced and visually appealing designs.

5. Is there any scientific evidence to support the use of the Golden Ratio in construction?

While the use of the Golden Ratio in construction has been a topic of debate, there is some scientific evidence to support its effectiveness. Studies have shown that the human brain does tend to find objects and structures with Golden Ratio proportions more visually appealing. However, the use of the Golden Ratio in construction is ultimately a matter of personal preference and aesthetic choice.

Similar threads

  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
866
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
61
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
950
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
3
Replies
100
Views
7K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
4
Replies
114
Views
6K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
Back
Top