Converted the 110W (j/s) into kWh

  • Thread starter Thread starter TyErd
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around converting the power consumption of fluorescent tubes from watts to kilowatt-hours (kWh) and calculating the total energy cost for a campus. Each fluorescent tube uses 0.11 kWh per hour, leading to a total power usage of 3,041,280 kWh and a cost of approximately $249,384.96 for the year, based on 240 days of operation. When accounting for a 4-hour daily unoccupied period, the usage drops to 253,400 kWh, resulting in a reduced cost of $207,820.80, yielding a savings of $41,564.16. The calculations are confirmed to be correct, considering the large number of fluorescent tubes in use. The analysis emphasizes the importance of accurate unit conversions and cost estimations in energy consumption assessments.
TyErd
Messages
297
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have attached the question.


Homework Equations


-


The Attempt at a Solution


Well i first converted the 110W (j/s) into kWh which is 0.11kWh. so each tube used 0.11kWh an hour. now because there is 12 in each classroom and 6in each faculty room and 200 class rooms and 400 faculty rooms. That means there are 2400 tubes classroom tubes and 2400 faculty room tubes. that means for the 240 days it is a total power usage of: (0.11 x 2400 x 24 x 240) x 2 = 3041280 kWh. the cost then is 3041280 x 0.082 = $249384.96

When the lights are turned off during the unoccupied 4hours the total power usage then becomes: (0.11 x 2400 x 20 x 240) x 2 = 253400kWh, so the cost is 253400 x 0.082 = 207820.80. which means the campus will save $41564.16

Is this correct? the only thing that worries me is the numbers. $249384.96 is really high but then again it is an awful lot of fluorescent tubes.
 

Attachments

  • aaaaaaaaa.png
    aaaaaaaaa.png
    49 KB · Views: 566
Physics news on Phys.org


looks right to me
 


are the numbers correct?
 


1. Given:

1 classroom : 12 fluorescent
1 fluorescent : 110 Watts
1 office : 6 fluorescent
1 year : 240 days
$0.082 : 1 kWh
1 unoccupied period : 4h per day
$ ? [cost] : 1 year

2. Let's use the quantity of units for analysis.
The objective here is to match the units on the right side to the
required unit on the left side. We start with the unit $. In the given,
we have a ratio between $ and KWh so we wrote them down on the first
term of the right side of the equation. We do the process until the
uncancelled term is $/yr. We attach the values for each unit afterwards.

$/yr = $/kwh * W/flourescent * flourescent*(classroom+offices)
* days/yr * h/day

C = 0.082/1000 * 110 * (12*(200+400)) * 240 * 4 = answer
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...

Similar threads

Back
Top