Directional Derivative of Potential energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the notation used in classical physics, specifically in the context of potential energy and force equations. The indices "i" and "j" in "Vij" represent different particles, with "V23" indicating the potential energy between particle 2 and particle 3. The notation ∇i signifies that the derivative is taken with respect to the position of particle i, focusing on its coordinates rather than those of particle j. This distinction is crucial for understanding how forces are derived from potential energy changes specific to each particle's position. The clarification highlights that the derivatives pertain to the components of the position vector for particle i, emphasizing the importance of the subscript in the del operator.
vgptgupta
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm facing some problem in understanding few basic concepts of classical physics.

http://www.fotoshack.us/fotos/67357p0020-sel.jpg I cannot understand what does "ij" indicate in "Vij" and how does F=-∇iVij. Why ∇i, why not only ∇.

Please help anybody. I'm practically getting frustrated googling for answers.

N.B. Equation 1.29
http://www.fotoshack.us/fotos/74847p0019-sel.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
i and j in Vij are indices for particle numbers. As an example, V23 is the potential between particle 2 and particle 3.
##\nabla_i## refers to the change of the position of particle i.
 
Thanks for the "ij" explanation but what about my other question i.e., why F=-∇iVij and why ∇i, why not only ∇.
 
There is no obvious meaning of ∇. Derivative for what?
What is meant here is the change in potential for particle i.
 
So what does the line "the subscript i on the del operator indicates that the derivatives are with respect to the components of ri" mean.
 
It means that the derivatives are with respect to xi, yi and zi, not xj, yj and zj.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top