Energy density of an electromagnetic field

In summary, the conversation discusses the energy density of an electromagnetic field with a linear dielectric. It is found that the energy can be expressed as the dot product of the electric field and displacement vector, and that the energy density can be calculated by integrating over free charge and ignoring bound charge. It is noted that treating the bound charge independently leads to a breakdown in the formula for energy in a dielectric. The concept of macroscopic and microscopic electrodynamics is also mentioned, with a reference to Griffith's Electrodynamics for further discussion.
  • #1
PhysicsKT
17
0
The energy density of an electromagnetic field with a linear dielectric is often expressed as
1994848e8909b58aaa7dfa748264681c15b04cdb.png
. It is also known that energy can be found by
90ce12f273329132bc0a22e77cabd6fadd9317ec.png
. Using the latter, the energy density is found to be
2b95635ceca0346d915aadc5ef5f3f8047d12dd6.png
, as is well known. If you integrate the latter only over free charge and ignore bound charge, you write
a3e754ebda6b4b4d609f6ac85bb3d8b3f6fa3516.png
, use integration by parts, and obtain the first result. Does the first result neglect the energy from bound charge? If not, why does
2b95635ceca0346d915aadc5ef5f3f8047d12dd6.png
break down (I.e. why can’t one find the energy with a dielectric by treating the bound charge as its own independent charge arrangement and using formulae for a vacuum?)
 

Attachments

  • 1994848e8909b58aaa7dfa748264681c15b04cdb.png
    1994848e8909b58aaa7dfa748264681c15b04cdb.png
    741 bytes · Views: 600
  • 90ce12f273329132bc0a22e77cabd6fadd9317ec.png
    90ce12f273329132bc0a22e77cabd6fadd9317ec.png
    1,020 bytes · Views: 535
  • 2b95635ceca0346d915aadc5ef5f3f8047d12dd6.png
    2b95635ceca0346d915aadc5ef5f3f8047d12dd6.png
    826 bytes · Views: 558
  • a3e754ebda6b4b4d609f6ac85bb3d8b3f6fa3516.png
    a3e754ebda6b4b4d609f6ac85bb3d8b3f6fa3516.png
    700 bytes · Views: 453
  • 2b95635ceca0346d915aadc5ef5f3f8047d12dd6.png
    2b95635ceca0346d915aadc5ef5f3f8047d12dd6.png
    826 bytes · Views: 453
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You are mixing macroscopic with microscopic electrodynamics. For macroscopic electrodynamics ##u=\vec{E} \cdot \vec{D}/2## is correct. Within Markovian linear-response theory ##\vec{D}=\epsilon \vec{E}=\epsilon_0 \epsilon_r \vec{E}##.
 
  • #3
For some discussion, see Griffith's Electrodynamics.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1108420419/?tag=pfamazon01-20
View the table of contents and click on section 4.4.3 "Energy in Dielectric Systems". See especially the bottom of page 198 and the top of 199.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #4
I see. Makes perfect sense now. Thanks!
 

1. What is energy density of an electromagnetic field?

The energy density of an electromagnetic field is a measure of the amount of energy stored in a given volume of space due to the presence of an electromagnetic field.

2. How is energy density of an electromagnetic field calculated?

The energy density of an electromagnetic field can be calculated by taking the square of the electric and magnetic field strengths and adding them together, then multiplying by a constant known as the permittivity of free space.

3. What factors affect the energy density of an electromagnetic field?

The energy density of an electromagnetic field is affected by the strength and direction of the electric and magnetic fields, as well as the properties of the medium in which the field exists.

4. What are some real-world applications of energy density of an electromagnetic field?

The energy density of an electromagnetic field is used in various technologies, such as wireless communication, power generation, and medical imaging. It is also important in understanding the behavior of light and other electromagnetic waves.

5. How does the energy density of an electromagnetic field relate to the electromagnetic spectrum?

The energy density of an electromagnetic field is directly related to the frequency of the electromagnetic wave. As the frequency increases, the energy density also increases, and vice versa. This is why higher frequency electromagnetic waves, such as X-rays and gamma rays, are more energetic and potentially more harmful than lower frequency waves, such as radio waves.

Similar threads

  • Electromagnetism
Replies
4
Views
985
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
2
Views
757
Replies
1
Views
976
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
725
Replies
2
Views
787
  • Electromagnetism
2
Replies
43
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top