Evaluating Risk of Sliding for Harbour Breakwater

  • Thread starter lufbrajames
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sliding
In summary, the purpose of evaluating risk for sliding in a harbour breakwater is to ensure the safety and stability of the structure. This is done by identifying potential failure modes and determining the likelihood and consequences of sliding. The risk is calculated by considering various factors such as structural design, materials, and environmental conditions. The most common failure modes for harbour breakwaters include sliding, overturning, and wave overtopping. To mitigate the risk of sliding, proper design and construction techniques, regular maintenance, and protective measures can be implemented. The consequences of a sliding failure in a harbour breakwater can be significant, including damage to the structure and nearby infrastructure, disruption of port operations, economic losses, and safety hazards.
  • #1
lufbrajames
50
0

Homework Statement



Assignment No.4. Harbour Breakwater Evaluation.

Consider a harbour breakwater constructed with massive concrete tanks filled with sand. It is necessary to evaluate the risk that the breakwater will slide under the pressure of a large wave during a major storm. Stability against sliding exists when the ratio of the resultant horizontal force Rh to the resultant of the vertical force Rv does not exceed the coefficient of friction, X1.

The resultant of the vertical forces Rv is given by the algebraic sum of the weight of the tank reduced for buoyancy, X2, and the vertical component of dynamic uplift pressure due to the breaking wave, Fv.

Rv = X2 - Fv

In turn Fv is proportional to the height of the wave, Hb, when the slope of the sea bottom is known. A simplification of the shoaling effect makes the wave height proportional to the deepwater value, X4.

Fv = a1X3X4

where a1 is the constant of proportionality and X3 is an additional variate to represent the uncertainties caused by the above simplification.

The resultant Rh of the horizontal forces depends on the balance between the static and dynamic pressure components and under a simplifying hypothesis on the depth of the breakwater can be taken to be a quadratic function of the wave height Hb which in turn is proportional to X4

Rh = X3(a3X4+a2X24)

The constants a1 to a3 depend on the detailed geometry of the breakwater system.
The following data refers to conditions in La Spezia harbour Italy. From the sea bottom profile and the geometry of the breakwater wall at La Spezia, engineers have estimated that

a1 = 70 , a2 = 17 m/kN and a3 = 145.

The variables X1 to X4 are independent variates (because for example the friction coefficient along a unit width of the vertical breakwater wall at La Spezia is not known precisely) with the following means and standard deviations

mu1 = 0.64, mu2 = 3400 kN/m, mu3 = 1 and mu4 = 5.461 m .

sigma1 = 0.096, sigma2 = 170 kN/m, sigma3 = 0.2, sigma4 = 1.081 m .

Assume that Rh and RvX1 follow weibull distributions.

-- Find the mean value for Rv

-- Find the standard deviation for Rv

and more questions which i haven't got to yet

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Right well i think I've done the first bit, just using the mean values for the x's and the actual values for a1 to get 1931.347

by first doing

Fv = a1*X3*X4 and then Rv = X2 - Fv

Do i just do the same for the standard deviation, by using the standard deviations in the equations? the standard deviation question is worth a lot more marks... :S
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


your response to this forum post would likely include the following:

Firstly, it is important to clarify that the given problem is a hypothetical scenario and not an actual case study. it is important to always use real data and information when conducting evaluations and making conclusions.

In terms of the mean value for Rv, your approach seems correct. However, it is important to note that the given values for a1, a2, and a3 are not in consistent units. Therefore, it may be necessary to convert them into the same units before using them in the calculations.

For the standard deviation of Rv, it is necessary to use the standard deviations of all the independent variates (X1 to X4) in the calculation. This can be done by using the formula for propagation of uncertainty, which takes into account the standard deviations of all the variables involved in the calculation.

Furthermore, it is important to consider the assumptions made in the problem, such as the use of Weibull distributions for Rh and RvX1. These assumptions may affect the accuracy of the results and should be carefully evaluated.

In addition, as a scientist, it is important to consider the limitations of the given data and assumptions. It may be necessary to conduct further research and gather more data in order to make a more accurate evaluation of the breakwater's stability.

Lastly, it is important to communicate the results and conclusions in a clear and concise manner, using appropriate figures and tables to support the findings. This will allow for a better understanding of the problem and the proposed solutions.

In conclusion, as a scientist, it is important to approach this problem with a critical and analytical mindset, taking into account all the relevant factors and considering the limitations of the given data. By following a systematic approach and using appropriate methods, a more accurate evaluation of the breakwater's stability can be achieved.
 
  • #3


I would approach this problem by first understanding the variables and equations involved. It is important to note that the breakwater system is constructed with concrete tanks filled with sand, and the stability against sliding is determined by the ratio of the resultant horizontal force to the resultant vertical force. The values of these forces depend on various factors, such as the weight of the tank, buoyancy, dynamic uplift pressure, and the geometry of the breakwater system.

To find the mean value for Rv, we can use the given means and equations to calculate the values of Fv and Rv. As mentioned in the problem statement, Fv is proportional to the height of the wave, which is in turn proportional to X4. Therefore, the mean value of Fv can be calculated by multiplying the mean values of a1, X3, and X4. Similarly, the mean value of Rv can be calculated by subtracting the mean value of Fv from the mean value of X2.

To find the standard deviation for Rv, we can use the given standard deviations and equations to calculate the values of Fv and Rv. The standard deviation of Fv can be calculated by using the standard deviations of a1, X3, and X4. Similarly, the standard deviation of Rv can be calculated by using the standard deviations of Fv and X2.

It is important to note that the variables X1 to X4 are independent variates, which means they are not directly related to each other. Therefore, to find the standard deviation of Rv, we need to take into account the standard deviations of all the variables involved.

Other questions, such as finding the probability of the breakwater sliding under a certain wave height, can be answered by using the Weibull distributions and the given constants and variables. it is important to carefully analyze all the data and equations and use appropriate methods to find accurate and reliable results.
 

1. What is the purpose of evaluating risk for sliding in a harbour breakwater?

The evaluation of risk for sliding in a harbour breakwater is important to ensure the safety and stability of the structure. It helps to identify potential failure modes and determine the likelihood and consequences of sliding, allowing for necessary mitigation measures to be implemented.

2. How is risk of sliding calculated for a harbour breakwater?

The risk of sliding for a harbour breakwater is calculated by considering factors such as the structural design, materials used, environmental conditions, and potential failure modes. This information is then used to determine the probability of sliding and the potential consequences, resulting in an overall risk assessment.

3. What are the common failure modes for harbour breakwaters?

The most common failure modes for harbour breakwaters include sliding, overturning, and wave overtopping. Sliding occurs when the structure moves horizontally, while overturning is the rotation of the structure due to external forces. Wave overtopping is when waves exceed the height of the breakwater, causing damage and potential failure.

4. How can the risk of sliding be mitigated for a harbour breakwater?

The risk of sliding for a harbour breakwater can be mitigated through various measures, such as proper design and construction techniques, regular inspections and maintenance, and implementing protective measures such as armouring or slope stabilization. It is also important to consider the potential impacts of climate change and incorporate adaptive measures into the design.

5. What are the consequences of a sliding failure in a harbour breakwater?

The consequences of a sliding failure in a harbour breakwater can be significant, including damage to the structure, disruption of port operations, and potential harm to nearby infrastructure and the environment. It can also result in economic losses and pose a safety hazard to nearby communities and vessels.

Back
Top