Find a Small, Low RPM Generator for Your DIY Turbine - 100-300RPM!

In summary: If perhaps you have a local hobby shop that caters to model car and plane clubs, they might get you in contact with some enthusiast that will be willing to assist you in rebuilding a motor that will meet your exact specifications. with just a little skill and learning and very little money you can have the satisfaction of doing it yourself.
  • #1
van4
11
0
Hi all,

Does anyone know of, or can anyone point me in the right direction for where to find a small, low rpm generator? RPM can be anywhere in the range of 100-300RPM, and size would be around 50mm long.

To put this into context, I am building a small turbine (~300mm diameter), which will rotate within the limits mentioned above. Therefore, I need something that will convert my mechanical energy of around 16 Watts, to electrical energy that I can monitor.

The main reason for the low rpm, is that I'd like to avoid the use of a gearbox. I don't have much power to lose. I've looked at some small motor/generators, but they all seem to have very high gearing.

Any help would be appreciated! Thanks in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I can't suggest a specific model that might suit this project.
One thing to bear in mind though, is that at lower rpm, you'll need more powerful magnets and bigger coils to get efficient conversion.
 
  • #3
How large can it be? Can you build it yourself? Use a very large number phases on a large diameter rotor.

BoB
 
  • #4
Your requirements are not that unusual. Wind generators need low RPM generators too.

I see lots of them listed on alibaba.com
 
  • Like
Likes JBA
  • #5
rootone said:
I can't suggest a specific model that might suit this project.
One thing to bear in mind though, is that at lower rpm, you'll need more powerful magnets and bigger coils to get efficient conversion.
I am very limited for space, so I think I will have to increase the rpm via gears, so that I can keep the size of the motor to a minimum

rbelli1 said:
How large can it be? Can you build it yourself? Use a very large number phases on a large diameter rotor.

BoB
It needs to be smaller than 60mm diameter, and 60mm in length. I don't think I have the expertise to build one myself

anorlunda said:
Your requirements are not that unusual. Wind generators need low RPM generators too.

I see lots of them listed on alibaba.com
I had a look, but what I need is much smaller. They generate hundreds of Watts at the least. I'm looking for something that can generate up to 20 Watts
 
  • #6
How about the kind of dynamos used for generating enough power from a bike wheel to light a few lamps/leds ?
Is that getting near what you need?
 
  • #7
rootone said:
How about the kind of dynamos used for generating enough power from a bike wheel to light a few lamps/leds ?
Is that getting near what you need?
My initial thought is - yes, that's what I need. I will have to look into this though. I suspect that the RPM and torque that my turbine provides will be much less than is provided by a large diameter human-powered tyre, driving a small dynamo shaft. Again, I will need to look into this because I haven't had any exposure to the operation of these devices
 
  • #8
OK. anyway what is your turbine project about?
 
  • #10
Well yes, you can make an electric motor.
but no you cannot make a motor to drive a generator producing more power than is input.
The laws of physics as presently undoorstood forbid this, and with good reason
 
  • #11
van4 said:
I am very limited for space, so I think I will have to increase the rpm via gears, so that I can keep the size of the motor to a minimumIt needs to be smaller than 60mm diameter, and 60mm in length. I don't think I have the expertise to build one myselfI had a look, but what I need is much smaller. They generate hundreds of Watts at the least. I'm looking for something that can generate up to 20 Watts

If perhaps you have a local hobby shop that caters to model car and plane clubs, they might get you in contact with some enthusiast that will be willing to assist you in rebuilding a motor that will meet your exact specifications. with just a little skill and learning and very little money you can have the satisfaction of doing it yourself. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes van4
  • #12
van4 said:
I suspect that the RPM and torque that my turbine provides will be much less than is provided by a large diameter human-powered tyre, driving a small dynamo shaft.
A quick Google tells me bicycle dynamos are mostly 6W so you have over double the required shaft power available.
Not that it would work as their working rpm it's too high.
 
  • Like
Likes van4
  • #13
I still want to know what is your turbine concept.
It sounds interesting,, but very likely it could be something already tried.
Anyway I will follow your thread.
 
  • #14
rootone said:
I still want to know what is your turbine concept.
It sounds interesting,, but very likely it could be something already tried.
Anyway I will follow your thread.
I'm looking at the difference in efficiency between a standard turbine, and one modified with a diffuser. It has been proven theoretically, but not experimentally.
RonL said:
If perhaps you have a local hobby shop that caters to model car and plane clubs, they might get you in contact with some enthusiast that will be willing to assist you in rebuilding a motor that will meet your exact specifications. with just a little skill and learning and very little money you can have the satisfaction of doing it yourself. :smile:
It may be the case if I can't find anything off the shelf. It sounds like an interesting challenge.
rootone said:
Well yes, you can make an electric motor.
but no you cannot make a motor to drive a generator producing more power than is input.
The laws of physics as presently undoorstood forbid this, and with good reason
I'm very well aware of this. I don't think I ever mentioned building a perpetual motion turbine though..
 
  • #15
van4 said:
I'm looking at the difference in efficiency between a standard turbine, and one modified with a diffuser. It has been proven theoretically, but not experimentally.

In that case, I suggest that you completely forget generating electricity. Electricity is not your goat, measuring the power of your turbine is.

Make instead a small water pump. You can accurately monitor its energy production by measuring how much water it can lift a known height in a known time period. There are dozens of compact and low speed designs useful for water pumps, dating all the way back to the 3rd century BC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes'_screw. On YouTube I see 318,000 videos on home made water pumps

As a matter of fact, the goat is to measure the difference in turbine efficiency with and without the diffuser. That means that the absolute efficiency of the water pump doesn't matter as long as the efficiency doesn't change when you add the diffuser to the turbine.
 
  • #16
van4 said:
It needs to be smaller than 60mm diameter, and 60mm in length.
that's small.
Is this a home experiment project ?
I took apart a cordless drill and found it built around a permanent magnet motor about that size. Junkshops are full of them , when the battery goes bad you can get them for just a couple bucks... they use planetary reduction gear so i don't know what speed the actual motor is.
Car window electric motors are surprisingly small nowadays. There's another possibility. You'll find reduction gears in them too. But poking around junkyards often gives one an idea.

You didn't say what voltage you want, if just a few volts DC will do give that a try. Get one and spin it with your electric drill, see what it puts out,
 
  • Like
Likes van4
  • #17
jim hardy said:
that's small.
Is this a home experiment project ?
I took apart a cordless drill and found it built around a permanent magnet motor about that size. Junkshops are full of them , when the battery goes bad you can get them for just a couple bucks... they use planetary reduction gear so i don't know what speed the actual motor is.
Car window electric motors are surprisingly small nowadays. There's another possibility. You'll find reduction gears in them too. But poking around junkyards often gives one an idea.

You didn't say what voltage you want, if just a few volts DC will do give that a try. Get one and spin it with your electric drill, see what it puts out,
He mentioned 20 watts, that's 12 volts and less than 2 amps @ around 300 rpm, seems like a piece of cake to me. :smile:
 
  • #18
anorlunda said:
In that case, I suggest that you completely forget generating electricity. Electricity is not your goat, measuring the power of your turbine is.

Make instead a small water pump. You can accurately monitor its energy production by measuring how much water it can lift a known height in a known time period. There are dozens of compact and low speed designs useful for water pumps, dating all the way back to the 3rd century BC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes'_screw. On YouTube I see 318,000 videos on home made water pumps

As a matter of fact, the goat is to measure the difference in turbine efficiency with and without the diffuser. That means that the absolute efficiency of the water pump doesn't matter as long as the efficiency doesn't change when you add the diffuser to the turbine.
It's for my thesis research. I see what you mean about the pump, but my aim and method are set out in a different way to the concept you mentioned.

RonL said:
He mentioned 20 watts, that's 12 volts and less than 2 amps @ around 300 rpm, seems like a piece of cake to me. :smile:
I feel like there is light at the end of the tunnel. I think I will use a 12V DC motor from a hobby/robotics shop. I can put a resistor in my circuit to vary the load.
 
  • #19
Is this for some kind of remote control plane or boat? What is the goal of your project?

You do know a permenant magnet dc motor can be a generator also? If you get two motors you can hook them up shaft to shaft and put DC on one and get DC on the other one, different voltage probably but it would transfer power from one form to another. Of course you lose energy to friction but it would work.

And for your small turbine project, any of those DC hobby motors can be a generator too and they are a lot smaller than 60X60 mm. More like 15X 20mm (just an estimate)
 
  • #20
van4 said:
I'm looking at the difference in efficiency between a standard turbine, and one modified with a diffuser. It has been proven theoretically, but not experimentally.
I have just done a similar project, measuring efficiencies of various mixed flow fan and housing designs.
I started by using fluid power out/electrical power into measure efficiency, it sounds like you'll be doing electrical power out/fluid power in, so same idea.
My experience was that this was a waste of time, the change in motor efficiency with RPM swamped changes in fan & housing efficiency. The motor manufacturers characteristic curves were not accurate enough to correct the problem, so I couldn't separate the change in motor efficiency from the change in fan efficiency. Presumably you'll need to operate your turbine & diffuser at a range of RPM, and that the addition of the diffuser will change the efficiency curve and you're looking for that new curve, so I think you'll have the same problem.

What I ended up measuring was:
motor torque (Mounting the motor in bearings and using a https://www.amazon.com/dp/B007Q9WMV8/?tag=pfamazon01-20)
motor RPM
air temp.
Absolute pressure (atmospheric)
differential pressure (across Venturi flow meter)
differential pressure (Fan outlet to atmospheric)
Current
Voltage
All via an arduino.

From those I could plot Electrical power in, shaft power out, volumetric flow rate, mass flow rate, pressures etc and efficiencies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
billy_joule said:
I have just done a similar project, measuring efficiencies of various mixed flow fan and housing designs.
I started by using fluid power out/electrical power into measure efficiency, it sounds like you'll be doing electrical power out/fluid power in, so same idea.
My experience was that this was a waste of time, the change in motor efficiency with RPM swamped changes in fan & housing efficiency. The motor manufacturers characteristic curves were not accurate enough to correct the problem, so I couldn't separate the change in motor efficiency from the change in fan efficiency. Presumably you'll need to operate your turbine & diffuser at a range of RPM, and that the addition of the diffuser will change the efficiency curve and you're looking for that new curve, so I think you'll have the same problem.

What I ended up measuring was:
motor torque (Mounting the motor in bearings and using a https://www.amazon.com/dp/B007Q9WMV8/?tag=pfamazon01-20)
motor RPM
air temp.
Absolute pressure (atmospheric)
differential pressure (across Venturi flow meter)
differential pressure (Fan outlet to atmospheric)
Current
Voltage
All via an arduino.

From those I could plot Electrical power in, shaft power out, volumetric flow rate, mass flow rate, pressures etc and efficiencies.
Thanks for your very informative reply! Your project seems interesting. What was the conclusion!?

Mine is in fact, very similar. What I will do though, is build a turbine which will be tested in a wave tank with constant velocity. I will then simply add the diffuser while keeping all other parameters the same. This should give me intitial curves for the turbine, which I will compare to the curves I get from using the diffuser. I'm not worried about HOW much difference there will be, I'm only concerned with documenting the difference.

I will be using an Arduino as well for the same reason, although I'm not sure if I should learn how to interface it with Matlab, or just use it by itself. Any tips or hints on challenges you had with the Arduino in your project?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #22
van4 said:
Thanks for your very informative reply! Your project seems interesting. What was the conclusion!?
The conclusion was that my bosses idea was a bad one and we shouldn't pursue it any further :wink: It was a very interesting project though! The test rig was made to be used for other projects in the future so I had to build it with adaptability in mind.

Mine is in fact, very similar. What I will do though, is build a turbine which will be tested in a wave tank with constant velocity. I will then simply add the diffuser while keeping all other parameters the same. This should give me intitial curves for the turbine, which I will compare to the curves I get from using the diffuser. I'm not worried about HOW much difference there will be, I'm only concerned with documenting the difference.
OK, sounds like you're on the right track then.

I will be using an Arduino as well for the same reason, although I'm not sure if I should learn how to interface it with Matlab, or just use it by itself. Any tips or hints on challenges you had with the Arduino in your project?
There were a lot of challenges, too many to list! Mainly getting accurate, stable readings from the different sensor types.

It sounds like you only need to measure the generated voltage? You could have the arduino run the test for you, have it switch in X resistor across the generator, wait for a stable reading, record/display it, then repeat for all the required resistance values to get the points on the curves. Or will you be measuring RPM too?
http://www.skillbank.co.uk/arduino/measure.htm
 
  • #23
billy_joule said:
It sounds like you only need to measure the generated voltage? You could have the arduino run the test for you, have it switch in X resistor across the generator, wait for a stable reading, record/display it, then repeat for all the required resistance values to get the points on the curves. Or will you be measuring RPM too?
http://www.skillbank.co.uk/arduino/measure.htm
I will be measuring the generated voltage against a range of resistances, as you mentioned, and also measuring the change in RPM. I've been looking into some small DC motors with in-built encoders that I can use for the RPM measurement. The turbine housing is quite restricted for space, so an encoder would be a great solution.

The article you linked seems like a great source of relevant information. Thanks. I'm dreading the endless Arduino challenges, but kind of excited at the same time
 
  • #24
van4 said:
I will be measuring the generated voltage against a range of resistances, as you mentioned, and also measuring the change in RPM. I've been looking into some small DC motors with in-built encoders that I can use for the RPM measurement. The turbine housing is quite restricted for space, so an encoder would be a great solution.
An encoder is a great solution.
It wouldn't take much extra work to characterise the motors generating efficiency, so you can find absolute efficiencies rather than relative.
Hang a known weight on a pulley on the motor shaft and let it fall. Have the arduino log RPM and voltage. Electrical power out vs RPM comes from the load resistance, voltage & RPM, Shaft power in vs RPM comes from the RPM, weight, and pulley geometry & MOI. Then you can find generator efficiency vs RPM and use that function to find absolute turbine efficiency from your wave tank data.
 
  • #25
van4 said:
I'm looking at the difference in efficiency between a standard turbine, and one modified with a diffuser. It has been proven theoretically, but not experimentally.

It may be the case if I can't find anything off the shelf. It sounds like an interesting challenge.

I'm very well aware of this. I don't think I ever mentioned building a perpetual motion turbine though..

"I'm looking at the difference in efficiency between a standard turbine, and one modified with a diffuser. It has been proven theoretically, but not experimentally."
I don't see your goal. By the way it's already proven not just theoretically but experimentally too.(If you mean under standard turbine that with three blades on horizontal shaft.) Confusor isn't used to this design because of the too large consturction. If you are searching for a turbine with high efficiency and built in diffusor, please check the concept below. But first I would formulate the goal to reach in mind before doing anything in practice. Good luck!
http://world-harmony.com/max-velocity-turbine/
 
  • #26
Don't forget that the speed can be changed with a simple gear train. This would broaden your generator options quite a bit, I think.
 
  • #27
Old thread alert.
 

1. What is the purpose of finding a small, low RPM generator for a DIY turbine?

The purpose of finding a small, low RPM generator for a DIY turbine is to produce electricity from the rotational energy of the turbine. This can be used for various applications such as powering small devices or charging batteries.

2. How do I determine the appropriate RPM range for a generator?

The appropriate RPM range for a generator depends on the design and specifications of the turbine. Generally, a low RPM generator is suitable for small-scale turbines with a rotational speed of 100-300RPM. However, it is important to consult the manufacturer's guidelines or do further research to ensure compatibility.

3. Can any type of generator be used for a DIY turbine?

No, not all generators are suitable for a DIY turbine. It is important to choose a generator specifically designed for low RPM applications, such as permanent magnet generators or synchronous generators. These types of generators are more efficient at lower speeds and are better suited for small-scale turbines.

4. What are some factors to consider when choosing a small, low RPM generator?

Some factors to consider when choosing a small, low RPM generator include the power output, voltage and current ratings, and efficiency. It is also important to consider the size and weight of the generator, as well as the cost and availability.

5. Are there any safety precautions to keep in mind when using a DIY turbine and generator?

Yes, it is important to take proper safety precautions when using a DIY turbine and generator, as they involve working with electricity. This includes wearing appropriate protective gear, following manufacturer's instructions carefully, and ensuring proper grounding and wiring to prevent electric shock or other hazards.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
127
  • General Engineering
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top