Finding the displacement of a object as viewed through water

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krishna0703
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Displacement Water
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the apparent displacement of an object viewed underwater, the relevant formula involves the refractive index of water. Snell's Law can be used to derive the necessary calculations for determining the new angle and height of the object. A recommended resource provides a detailed explanation of these concepts, making it easier to understand the math involved. The discussion also touches on the practical challenges faced by fishermen when trying to spear fish from a boat. Understanding these principles can enhance the fishing experience and improve accuracy.
Krishna0703
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
hi everybody, suppose we are viewing an object in a pool whereby the object is actually at the bottom of the pool, ...so it will appear as if it has been displaced. what formula can we use to calculate the displacement of the object...??
are there any conditions applicable..help me with this detail please
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you a frustrated harpoon fisherman? I have spent ages trying to spear fish from the side of a boat. The Maths is not hard -
http://www.physicstutorials.org/home/optics/refraction-of-light/apparent-depth-real-depth" gives you the formula but it's hard to work it out on the fly and amidst the excitement of a massive Grey Mullett going past.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
nah man, there do have a formula related to the refractive index...
 
It's on that link for you to use at your leisure. The formula gives both the new angle and the new height. But, if you know Snell's Law, you should be able to derive it for yourself. At least, their derivation makes easy sense.

I'll get back to my fishing when my future son in law buys a new harpoon to replace the one he chucked over the side by mistake.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top