Geodesics subject to a restriction

In summary, the problem involves finding the trajectory of a particle in a 3-dimensional manifold with the smallest geodesic distance for a given time interval, subject to the constraint that the velocity is a constant. The standard method for solving such problems using the Euler-Lagrange equation does not apply here due to the restriction, and it is unclear if there is a unique solution. Additionally, the phrase "smallest distance" is ambiguous and could refer to either the distance travelled or the geodesic distance between start and end points.
  • #1
MrTictac
8
1
Hi, I'm trying to solve a differential geometry problem, and maybe someone can give me a hand, at least with the set up of it.

There is a particle in a 3-dimensional manifold, and the problem is to find the trajectory with the smallest distance for a time interval ##\Delta t=t_{1}-t_{0}##, subject to the restriction that the velocity module is a constant ##k##.

The problem without the restriction is well known, and can be solved by the following lagrangian:
##S=\int_{t_{0}}^{t_{1}}\sqrt{g_{ij}v^{i}v^{j}}dt##
Where ##g_{ij}## is the metric tensor, and ##v^{i}## is the velocity vector. By using the Euler-Lagrange equation:
##\frac{\partial \sqrt{g_{ij}v^{i}v^{j}}}{\partial x^{j}}=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial \sqrt{g_{ij}v^{i}v^{j}}}{\partial v^{j}}\right)##
However, the restriction being precisely ##\sqrt{g_{ij}v^{i}v^{j}}=k##, doesn't allow to set up the problem as before (or that's what I think). Would you know the correct way to solve it?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's not clear what the problem is asking. If the additional constraint has an effect (and I am not yet convinced that it does, given that a geodesic is sometimes described as a 'constant speed trajectory') then the result will not be a geodesic, and so we cannot use the geodesic equation. But then the only constraint we have is the constant speed one, and there are infinitely many curves that have constant speed. So there is no unique solution. For all those curves the particle will travel distance ##k(t_1-t_0)## in the allotted time.

Also, I am not sure what is meant above by 'with the smallest distance'. From the context it appears to mean 'smallest distance travelled' which, again, will be ##k(t_1-t_0)##. But it could also mean the smallest (geodesic) distance from start to end point. Is that what was intended? If so, that problem could have a unique solution, but I expect it will be possible for the distance to be zero - ie that it finishes where it starts, and that there will be multiple ways of achieving that result.
 
  • Like
Likes MrTictac
  • #3
andrewkirk said:
It's not clear what the problem is asking. If the additional constraint has an effect (and I am not yet convinced that it does, given that a geodesic is sometimes described as a 'constant speed trajectory') then the result will not be a geodesic, and so we cannot use the geodesic equation. But then the only constraint we have is the constant speed one, and there are infinitely many curves that have constant speed. So there is no unique solution. For all those curves the particle will travel distance ##k(t_1-t_0)## in the allotted time.
I think geodesics are described as constant speed trajectories due to the use of a natural parametrization, as Wikipedia says:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geodesic
At least, that's what I understood. What I'm intending to find is not a geodesic, because there is a restriction that prevents you to take the shortest path. As if you are using GPS to find a direction, but the street recommended by the app is closed to traffic, so you need to take another one, not as good as the original.

andrewkirk said:
Also, I am not sure what is meant above by 'with the smallest distance'. From the context it appears to mean 'smallest distance travelled' which, again, will be ##k(t_1-t_0)##. But it could also mean the smallest (geodesic) distance from start to end point. Is that what was intended? If so, that problem could have a unique solution, but I expect it will be possible for the distance to be zero - ie that it finishes where it starts, and that there will be multiple ways of achieving that result.
I mean the smallest geodesic distance (subject to the restriction), yes.
 

1. What are geodesics subject to a restriction?

Geodesics subject to a restriction refer to the path of shortest distance between two points on a curved surface, while also adhering to a certain constraint or limitation.

2. What types of restrictions can be placed on geodesics?

Restrictions on geodesics can vary depending on the specific application, but some common examples include constraints on curvature, length, or energy.

3. How are geodesics subject to a restriction used in the field of science?

Geodesics subject to a restriction have many applications in science, including in physics, engineering, and mathematics. They are used to model and understand the behavior of particles, light, and other phenomena in curved spaces.

4. Can geodesics subject to a restriction be applied to real-world situations?

Yes, geodesics subject to a restriction have practical applications in fields such as navigation, robotics, and computer graphics. They can also be used to optimize paths in transportation and logistics.

5. What are some challenges in studying geodesics subject to a restriction?

Some challenges in studying geodesics subject to a restriction include the complexity of the mathematical equations involved, as well as the need for advanced computational methods to solve them. Additionally, the interpretation and visualization of geodesics in higher dimensions can be difficult.

Similar threads

  • Differential Geometry
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
292
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
1K
Back
Top