MHB How Can You Verify the Sum of Roots in a Quadratic Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To verify the sum of the roots in a quadratic equation ax^2 + bx + c = 0, the roots A and B can be expressed as A = (-b + √(b² - 4ac))/(2a) and B = (-b - √(b² - 4ac))/(2a). Adding these two roots results in the radicals canceling out, simplifying the expression to (-2b)/(2a). This further simplifies to -b/a, confirming the relationship A + B = -b/a. Thus, the theorem regarding the sum of the roots is logically verified through this process.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Let A and B be roots of the quadratic equation
ax^2 + bx + c = 0. Verify the statement.

A + B = -b/a

What are the steps to verify this statement?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Let A and B be roots of the quadratic equation
ax^2 + bx + c = 0. Verify the statement.

A + B = -b/a

What are the steps to verify this statement?
There is a theorem for this, but let's do it logically. The two solutions, A and B of the quadratic are
[math]A = \frac{-b + \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}[/math] and [math]B = \frac{-b - \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}[/math]

Now add the two. (Hint: What happens to the radicals?)

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
There is a theorem for this, but let's do it logically. The two solutions, A and B of the quadratic are
[math]A = \frac{-b + \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}[/math] and [math]B = \frac{-b - \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}[/math]

Now add the two. (Hint: What happens to the radicals?)

-Dan

The radicals disappear. We are then left with (-2b)/(2a).
Of course, (-2b)/(2a) simplifies to -b/a.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top