How do we visualize EM radiation?

In summary: The green lines are equipotential lines. The thing is symmetrical about the source and the field lines in the far field are indeed spherical. The thing to remember is that these are for a dipole, which is a source, and if you increase the field strength you get more radiation, but you don't change the basic pattern. As you say, the antenna itself is not a point source and the field pattern is much more complicated, but not at all random, because the field lines are the gradient of the potential and the potential is fixed by the antenna shape and the charge distribution.
  • #1
Gersty
47
1
What is the best analogy to explain electromagnetic fields? I have seen the depictions of em radiation as perpendicular waves. Do we exist in a huge sphere of em radiation in which waves such as cell phone signals and radio broadcasts can be thought of as spherical ripples that emanate at the speed of light?
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Gersty said:
What is the best analogy to explain electromagnetic fields? I have seen the depictions of em radiation as perpendicular waves. Do we exist in a huge sphere of em radiation in which waves such as cell phone signals and radio broadcasts can be thought of as spherical ripples that emanate at the speed of light?

You have a jumbled mixture of terminology here.

First of all, in your title, you used the term "EM radiation". To me, this means "light", as in electromagnetic wave, in which visible light is a part of. Whenever this is used, then this is a solution to the wave equation derived from Maxwell equations. This is where you get the E and B component of the EM wave being perpendicular to each other. So these are not usually called "perpendicular waves", but rather transverse wave, because the direction of motion of the wave is perpendicular to both the oscillating E and B field components of the wave.

But by saying that, it also means that ALL wave properties apply to this "EM radiation", including the relevant boundary conditions. A wave propagating in "free space" has different geometry than a wave coming off an antenna, and has a different geometry than a wave in a waveguide. You also have a difference between traveling wave and standing wave. An EM wave coming out of an antenna is not a "spherical ripple". It may have a circular wave fronts, and there may be some vertical spread in the wave, but most of the energy is directed horizontally due to the geometry of the source. An antenna is typically not a point point source, so it does not produce spherical waves. Again, boundary conditions.

So no, we do not exist in a "... huge sphere of em radiation ... "

Zz.
 
  • #3
Gersty said:
spherical ripples
The simplest form of electromagnetic radiation is "dipole radiation" produced by an oscillating electric dipole, e.g. a simple radio antenna. Here's an example of the electric field pattern:

Dipole_xmting_antenna_animation_4_408x318x150ms.gif


As you can see, the pattern has a spherical aspect to it, but it's not uniform in all directions. The amplitude and direction of the fields that you observe depend on the direction of your location with respect to the dipole axis (vertical in this example).

A Google search for "dipole radiation" turns up many more pictures and animations. (This one is from the Wikipedia article on dipole antennas.)
 

Attachments

  • Dipole_xmting_antenna_animation_4_408x318x150ms.gif
    Dipole_xmting_antenna_animation_4_408x318x150ms.gif
    364.3 KB · Views: 421
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #4
jtbell said:
As you can see, the pattern has a spherical aspect to it, but it's not uniform in all directions.
You have to spend some time looking at that (good) animation to get the full message. The fields depicted are 'near field' and the funny business at the ends of the dipole shows that the amplitude (increased spacing of the field lines) goes to zero along the axis. It's interesting (or obvious, depending on how it grabs you) how the E lines near the poles point the wrong way and at the poles and not parallel to the wires, like in the rest of the field.
 

1. How do we see electromagnetic (EM) radiation?

EM radiation is not visible to the naked eye because it has a much shorter wavelength than visible light. However, we can see objects that emit EM radiation, such as the sun, because they produce visible light as a result of their high temperatures.

2. What tools do scientists use to visualize EM radiation?

Scientists use a variety of tools to visualize EM radiation, depending on the specific wavelength they are studying. These tools may include telescopes, microscopes, spectrometers, and detectors that can capture and measure different wavelengths of EM radiation.

3. How do we convert EM radiation into images?

To convert EM radiation into images, scientists use specialized detectors that convert the radiation into an electronic signal. This signal is then processed and converted into an image using computer software. The resulting image can provide valuable information about the source and properties of the EM radiation.

4. Can we see all types of EM radiation?

No, we cannot see all types of EM radiation. Our eyes are only sensitive to a small portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, known as visible light. However, with the use of specialized tools and technology, scientists can detect and visualize a much broader range of EM radiation, including radio waves, microwaves, infrared, ultraviolet, X-rays, and gamma rays.

5. How does visualizing EM radiation help us understand the universe?

Visualizing EM radiation allows scientists to study and understand the properties and behaviors of different objects and phenomena in the universe. By analyzing the characteristics of EM radiation, such as its intensity, wavelength, and polarization, scientists can gain insights into the composition, temperature, and movements of celestial bodies, as well as the processes that govern the universe.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
216
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top