How does smoothing an AC voltage with a capacitor work?

AI Thread Summary
Smoothing AC voltage with a capacitor involves charging the capacitor to its peak voltage, which occurs when the AC source delivers sufficient current, minus a small voltage drop across the diode. The discussion addresses confusion regarding the capacitor's discharge calculations, particularly in parts (iii) and (iv), where the participant miscalculates the voltage difference during discharge. Clarification is provided that the peak voltage is 20V, leading to a maximum amplitude of 10V when considering peak-to-peak values. Additionally, "conducting" refers to the diode allowing current flow when the input voltage exceeds the output voltage, which does not occur continuously. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately solving the problems presented.
phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Screenshot 2021-03-11 at 8.14.51 PM.png

Specifically for part (i) and (ii), I get the rough idea that when the voltage of the AC source is decreasing, the capacitor can discharge to "cushion" the drop in voltage. However, I have some questions about when this occurs.

1. There is an assumption that the capacitor will be charged to maximum when the AC voltage reaches its peak. Why is this assumption (largely) true?

2. How should I solve part (iii) and part (iv)?
For part (iii), I know that the period of discharge is approximately 1/f = 0.02, and RC = 0.5.
The capacitor should have Voltage = 20(e^-0.02/0.5), and the maximum voltage is 20V. The difference of the 2 values is 0.78, which is twice the correct answer of 0.39V. (BTW I am assuming 20V is the max voltage, not the RMS value, do correct me if I'm wrong.)

For part (iv), I think I am not very clear on what "conducting" means. I took "conducting" to mean "allows current to flow through", isn't that just 50% of the time?

All help is appreciated, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
phantomvommand said:
1. There is an assumption that the capacitor will be charged to maximum when the AC voltage reaches its peak. Why is this assumption (largely) true?
If the voltage source can deliver the necessary current, then the capacitor is charged up to the maximum voltage minus the (small) voltage drop over the diode.
Before we delve into iii and iv, please post your sketches and describe them in some detail. Then your questions about them will be easier to tackle.
 
BvU said:
Hi,
If the voltage source can deliver the necessary current, then the capacitor is charged up to the maximum voltage minus the (small) voltage drop over the diode.
Before we delve into iii and iv, please post your sketches and describe them in some detail. Then your questions about them will be easier to tackle.
Screenshot 2021-03-11 at 9.02.12 PM.png

Thanks for the reply. Above are my sketches. Due to smaller RC value for the 100 ohm case, the capacitor discharges much much faster. I think that part (iii) is asking for the difference in potential between the point where the potential of discharged capacitor = potential of AC source, and the maximum point.
 
phantomvommand said:
For part (iii), I know that the period of discharge is approximately 1/f = 0.02, and RC = 0.5.
The capacitor should have Voltage = 20(e^-0.02/0.5), and the maximum voltage is 20V. The difference of the 2 values is 0.78, which is twice the correct answer of 0.39V. (BTW I am assuming 20V is the max voltage, not the RMS value, do correct me if I'm wrong.)
The 20 V is given is said to be peak-to-peak, so the amplitude is 10 V and there is your factor 2.

phantomvommand said:
For part (iv), I think I am not very clear on what "conducting" means. I took "conducting" to mean "allows current to flow through", isn't that just 50% of the time?
The diode conducts if the voltage at the anode (input) is greater than the voltage at the cathode (output )
1615468525693.png

So you are supposed to set up some equation and estimate the time this is the case.

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top